Whereas Mark had John baptise Jesus as a matter of course, and Matthew established a clear sense of precedence by having John argue that it should be Jesus who baptised him, there is no mention in John of the baptism of Jesus, although prior knowledge of the synoptic gospels means we usually assume this to have occurred. Some say that John felt it was inappropriate for the divine person of Jesus to be baptised by John the Baptist. Nowhere. What John wrote in his Gospel was, he saw the spirit descended from heaven as a form of a dove.....
No, John the Baptist did.
The baptism of water was by John the Baptist, but baptism of Fire byLord Maitreya
I believe with John The Baptist cousin of Jesus.
In the Bible, Jesus himself did not physically baptize anyone. Instead, his disciples baptized people in his name. Jesus' baptism is recorded in the Gospels, where John the Baptist baptized him in the Jordan River.
No, and the name is John the Baptist :)
John the Baptist was the "voice in the wilderness" that spoke of the coming messiah. John asked people to repent and baptized people in the Jordan river. When Jesus came to him, John told his followers to follow him instead. John said "he must increase and I must decrease". John was an apostle of Jesus who traditionally wrote the Book of John (Fourth Gospel). John was the brother of James, known as the sons of Zebedee and also Sons of Thunder because they had tempers. John writes of John the Baptist in the Gospel starting with John 1:6.
AnswerApollo is a Greek god, while John the Baptist was a Jew. It is very unlikely that Apollo really had anything to do with John.
As John and Jesus were cousins, it could be Nazareth.
to baptise people in the baptist church. Baptist churches only baptise adults because they believe that
John the Baptist (who was actually a second cousin of Jesus') was beheaded.
John the baptist then they are cousins.
Jesus is God. John the baptist and Elijah are not.