At the time of His crucifixion, the Romans put a sign at the top of Jesus' cross that said "Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews." This was at the order of Pilate. The Chief Priests complained to Pilate that it should have said "This man claimed to be king of the Jews", but Pilate refused their argument, saying "What I have written will stay written".
Pilate had a board put on the cross , which said Jesus king of the Jews. This angered the Jews . And they wanted Pilate to write another board saying Jesus said I am the king of the Jews. And Pilate replied . What I have written I have written.AnswerMark 15:26, "The King of the Jews"Luke 23:38, "This is the King of the Jews"Matthew 27:37, "This is Jesus the King of the Jews"John 19:19, "Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews"
Ievs nazarevs rex iudea in latin but in English is Jesus of nazareth king of the Jews
Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum (Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews)
Mark15:26, "The King of the Jews" Luke 23:28, "This is the King of the Jews" (xxiii, 38). Matthew27:37, "This is Jesus the King of the Jews" (xxvii, 37). John19:19, "Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews" (xix, 19).
Jesus king of the jews
Jews...
King of the Jews.
I believe it said, "King of the Jews." The letters, 'INRI' represent the Latin words, 'Iesvs Nazarenvs Rex Iudaervm' (the latin uses I instead of J, and v instead of u) which means 'Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews'.
This is Jesus "King of the Jews".
Because it read 'King of the Jews'. The Pharisees (Jewish priests who had Jesus crucified) wanted it changed to "I say I am the king of the Jews" but Pilate would not.
The plaque over Jesus' head on the cross is commonly depicted with the Latin inscription "INRI," which stands for "Iesus Nazarenus, Rex Iudaeorum," meaning "Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews." This plaque was likely placed there by the Romans to signify the crime for which Jesus was being crucified.
The term "King of the Jews" was a term given to him by the Romans since they understood the term Messiah (like Jews at the time did) to refer to a terrestrial ruler. As a result, if Jesus was the Messiah as he claimed, he was effectively the "King of the Jews". However, the majority of Jews and both the Pharisaic and Sadducee Establishments would have rejected his claims to being the Messiah, so the Roman term is irrelevant to ascertaining Jews' true views of Jesus.