The respected Israeli archaeologist, Israel Finkelstein says that over 90 per cent of scholars do not believe there ever was an Exodus from Egypt as described in The Bible. On this view, Moses could never have been alive in the historical sense. And the Amarna Letters prove conclusively that Palestine continued to be ruled by petty Canaanite kings under overall Egyptian control until at least 1270 BCE.
So, Moses is certainly biblical, in fact one of the most important people in the Bible. But he was not historical.
Another answer from our community:
Both. Moses was a real person that led the nation of Israel at about 1445 BC. Google search it.
According to the biblical genealogy, Moses would have lived in the late bronze age. However, few scholars today believe that the story of Moses was really historical.
The biblical Moses had a brother named Aaron.
The biblical Moses had a brother named Aaron.
The basket that Moses was put into was referred to as an ARK.
moses
Moses
MOSES
From a biblical perspective, Moses helped the Israelites escape from their lives of slavery in Egypt. From a historical perspective, Moses did not help the Israelites escape from anywhere. After all, it has been reported that over 90 per cent of scholars say that there never was an Exodus from Egypt.
Has some misguided and distorted historical angles. The title refers to the Biblical character Moses, not an uppity modern Arab. There is the usual quota of violence, after all this was the Middle East!
the figure of moses is in the supreme court
No it was Jochebed
Surnames do not exist in the Biblical period. People were identified as "X son of Y". Moses would be Moses son of Amram and Yochebed.