answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

One view:

Yes! they derived it from Catholic Bible but they rejected some of the Books.The first who translated the Bible was the heretic John Wycliffe.After him,Martin Luther translated it to German and King James I of England translated it to English called the King James version.

Another answer:

No. There are two distinct history lines.

Whilst most of the modern translations come from the Alexandria text line where the catholic "bible" came from, the KJV came via the Antioch text line.

I do have a chart that explains these lines on my blog:

{below}

Roman Catholic AnswerYes, the "protestant Bible" is just the Bible as accepted by the Christian Catholic Church, for fifteen centuries until the protestant revolt, with the Deuterocanonical books removed.

It was Protestantism that removed these "deuterocanonical" books from the Bible, many centuries later. And contrary to the myth, the early Church did indeed accept these books as Scripture.

For a complete history of the Deuterocanon and why the protestants removed these books from the Bible, please read the book Why Catholic Bibles are Bigger at the link below.

The seven disputed books are: Tobit, Judith, 1 and 2 Maccabees, Wisdom of Solomon, Ecclesiasticus (or Sirach), and Baruch. Catholic Bibles also include an additional six chapters (107 verses) in Esther and three chapters (174 verses) in Daniel.

According to major Protestant scholars and historians, in the first four centuries Church leaders (e.g. St. Justin Martyr, Tertullian, St. Augustine, St. Ambrose, St. Cyprian, St. Irenaeus) generally recognized these seven books as canonical and scriptural, following the Septuagint Greek translation of the Old Testament, following the Council of Rome (382), and general consensus, finalized the New Testament canon while also including the deutercanon, in lists that were identical to that of the Council of Trent (1545-1563).

There's a scholarly consensus that this canon was pretty much accepted from the fourth century to the sixteenth, and indeed, the earliest Greek manuscripts of the Old Testament: the Codes Sinaiticus (fourth century) and Codex Alexandrinus (c. 450) include the (unseparated) deuterocanonical books. The Dead Sea Scrolls found at Qumran did not contain Esther, but did contain Tobit.

According to Douglas and Geisler, Jamnia (first century Jewish council) was not an authoritative council, but simply a gathering of scholars, and similar events occurred afterward. In fact, at Jamnia the canonicity of books such as Ester, Ecclesiastes, and the Song of Solomon was also disputed. Since both Protestants and Catholics accept these books today, this shows that Jamnia did not "settle" anything. The Jews were still arguing about the canonicity of the books mentioned earlier and also Proverbs into the early second century.

And St. Jerome's sometimes critical views on these books are not a clear-cut as Protestants often make them out to be. In his Apology Against Rufinus (402) for example, he wrote:

When I repeat what the Jews say against the story of Susanna and the the Hymn of the Three Children, and the fables of Bel and the Dragon, which are not contained in the Hebrew Bible, the man who makes this a charge against me proves himself to be a fool and a slanderer; for I explained not what I thought but what they commonly say against us (Apology Against Rufinus, book II, 33)

Significantly, St. Jerome included the deuterocanonical books in the Vulgate, his Latin translation of the Bible, (And he defended the inspiration of Judith in a preface to it.) All in all, there is no clear evidence that St. Jerome rejected these seven books, and much to suggest that he accepted them as inspired Scripture, as the Catholic Church does today. But St. Jerome (like any Church father) does not have the final authority in the Church. He's not infallible. The historical evidence, all things considered, strongly supports the Catholic belief that these books are inspired and thus indeed part of Holy Scripture

from The One-Minute Apologist by Dave Armstrong; Manchester, NH: Sophia Institute Press, 2007

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is the Protestant Bible derived from Catholic Bible?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Is the New Jerusalem Bible Catholic or Protestant?

The New Jerusalem Bible is Catholic.


Is King James a translation in the Catholic bible?

No, it is a Protestant Bible.


Ano ang mga paniniwala ng Protestante?

They differ in the number of books. Catholic has more number of books than Protestant. Protestant Bible only has 7 books while Catholic has 39. A catholic bible has Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur while a Protestant bible does not.


Is the NIV Young Women of Faith Bible Catholic?

Roman Catholic AnswerNo, the NIV is a protestant Bible, and the publishing firm that puts this out strictly publishes protestant books.


What is the name of the Catholic Bible?

The Protestant Bible has no specific name associated with it, other than "the Bible" or "the Holy Bible." The distinction is usually in the content; the Protestant Bible omits the Apocrypha and the Deuterocanonical books usually included in Roman Catholic texts. Both Catholic and Protestant Bibles come in a wide variety of translations.


Where does the word poor appear in the Bible?

Protestant or Catholic? (The Catholic Bible is longer, so there could be more examples.)


If there are two different Bibles namely the Catholic and the Protestant Bible which one is accuratly the true and correct Bible?

The catholic bible has about seven books added to he bible.


How many religions are derived from the Bible?

well, 3 i think (or 3 in you count Protestants and catholics 1 religion) so catholic, Protestant, and well Muslims as some of the stories told in the Muslim faith are from the bible ;D


Is New American Standard Bible catholic?

The New American Standard Bible is not Catholic and is missing the deuterocanonical books removed by the Protestant Reformers. The New American Bible, however, is Catholic.


Protestant Bible and Catholic Bible which is correct?

the Catholic Bible Actually, both are correct. However, the Protestants threw out a bunch of books of the Bible that did not fit with their teachings that are still recognized by Catholics as canonical. Therefore, the Catholic Bible is 'more correct.'


Can a Roman Catholic be a member of a Protestant church?

No. The Protestant Church began as a division away from Roman Catholic Church in the 14th century. The central ideas of the churches are similar, but the Protestant Church has altered the original Catholic Bible and disagrees with some Catholic ideas, such as confession.


Is the New American translation of the bible Protestant or Catholic?

It may be used by an denomination.