To answer this you really need to look at what you mean by human nature.
Are you asking, "is it natural for humans to commit evil acts?"
To this end, then, yes evil is a part of human nature. Humans are driven by chemical impulses over which they seem to exhibit little control. These impulses are dependant on many factors that are difficult to tease apart, but they do certainly drive people to commit what are essentially evil acts.
Are you asking "is evil justifiable by being referred to as a part of human nature?"
To this end, I would say that no, Evil is an avoidable act (for a free person). The yardstick for evil is here important, and it could be said that it is impossible to avoid any evil actions, but you can choose the lesser of two evils when these are the only options present. So, some evil is certainly justifiable to this end, but it is most certainly not possible to justify the amount of evil in this world by dismissing it as part of human nature.
Evil is a human construct, so in that regard it is also part of human nature. Without humans, there would be no concept of evil, but as to whether evil would still be present; yes, perhaps. There are feeling beings apart from us. Some have been suggested to kill for pleasure, which could certainly be considered evil, but the most common reply is that they are honing their hunting instincts. A 'neccesary' evil, such as killing for food could be considered in the best interests of survival, and if your definition of evil includes these 'necessary' evils, then evil most certainly exists in the world, with or without humans, and is, furthermore, unavoidable.
Another Answer:
Human Nature means what is inherent in all human. Living being in this world include human, animal and plant. The difference between human and animal is large due to what is inherent in human which animal does not have. Human has the mind to discrimate what is good and what is evil while animal does not. Like human, animal need to survive. They either 'fight' for survival or 'flight' for survival but they does not has the mind to discriminate good or bad. Sometime we use the word 'heart' or 'conscience' to describe this mind of discrimination. Although the 'heart' or 'conscience' is inherent in human, the level or standard or quality of this' heart' is not the same in everyone, e.g. the quality of heart of say, Hitler and that of Mother Teresa is defintely not the same or between a social worker and a murderer. For example, if you leave your money on the front seat of your 'unlock' car, 2 things could possibly happen - some one may steal your money or someone may lock your car on your behalf to prevent the money from being stolen; one has an evil intention while the other has good intention and this is due to the quality of the 'heart' or 'conscience' or the discriminating mind, which is inherent in all of us. So, what is evil or good depend on our 'heart'.
The concept of good and evil is subjective and varies among different cultures and individuals. Some argue that humans have an inherent sense of morality, while others believe that good and evil are learned behaviors influenced by society and environment. Ultimately, the presence of good and evil in human nature is a complex topic with no definitive answer.
Mother Nature is not inherently evil. Natural phenomena like hurricanes, earthquakes, and wildfires can cause destruction and harm, but they are not driven by malice. These events are part of the natural world's balance and are essential for the health and sustainability of ecosystems.
Good and evil are human concepts. Animals simply are.
you know already that human condition is a part of nature human is nature
To allow for medical progress in order to benefit human nature. It may be evil, but a necessary evil
acoording to all religious who is doing work against the human nature is call evil..
The fall of humanity reveals that their is evil among humans. The human morality changes over time as evil seeps into individuals. As good versus evil plays out, the fall of humanity reveals evil has won.
If you read William Golding's The Lord of the Flies, you will see that the theme of good vs. evil in human nature is a huge part. I think it's also probably present in the Hunger Games series.
The theme of a story offers insight into human nature.
The nature of human beings is complex and can vary from person to person. Some may argue that humans have the capacity for both good and evil, while others may believe that humans are inherently good but influenced by external factors. Ultimately, it is difficult to categorize all human beings as purely good or evil as individuals are capable of both positive and negative actions.
Views on human nature vary, but some believe that people are inherently capable of both good and evil actions. Redemption or personal growth can lead individuals to make better choices, but the potential for both good and evil remains. It's important to recognize the complexity and individuality of human behavior.
Humans are capable of such love and compassion that it could only be equaled by the utter evil that we do.