0
The Council of Nicea rejected Arianism, and they inserted anathemas at the end of the creed specifically meant to reject it.
"But the holy, catholic [i.e., "universal," not Roman Catholic], and apostolic church anathematizes those who say, "There was a time when he was not," and "He was not before he was begotten," and "He was made from that which did not exist," and those who assert that he is of other substance or essence than the Father, that he was created, or is susceptible of change." (Contained in The Ecclesiastical History of Socrates Scholasticus, Book I, ch. 8, from the 5th century and repeating a letter by Eusebius of Caesarea, who was at the council. The creed is also preserved in numerous letters and explanations from around the time of Nicea.)
That the Son did not exist prior to being begotten by God was a specific phrase used by Arius, and a letter of his to Eusebius of Nicomedia, his biggest supporter, has that phrase in it (Ecclesiastical History of Theodoret I:4: "We say ... that before he was begotten, created, purposed, or established he did not exist.").
The issue at Nicea was not per se whether Jesus was God, but whether he was created by God. Orthodoxy and a long history held that he was either eternally (always) begotten of the Father or that before he was begotten--in the beginning--he already existed inside the Father as his Word or Reason. Arius said he was not eternally begotten and didn't exist at all until being generated from the Father.
The council, as seen above, condemned that idea.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who forced the calling of the Council of Nicaea?
A:Emperor Constantine called the Council of Nicaea, meeting in 325 CE, to discuss and resolve various differences among the Christian bishops. Bishop Alexander of Alexandria had, around 318, already declared heretical the views of Arius and had him, and the clergy who supported him, excommunicated. In order to fully exclude Arius, Alexander introduced a motion opposed to what had become known as Arianism and had the wording that Christ was "of one being with God" adopted at Nicaea.
How was Arianism different from Catholicism?
The orthodox (Catholic) Christian Church had come to accept that Jesus was uncreated and equal to God the Father. Arius, a popular Libyan priest, declared that Jesus, while divine, was not divine in the same way as God the Father. He was a creation of God. Arianism became a major sect of Christianity and eventually even Emperor Constantius was keen for the orthodox Church to accept the Arian creed The Arian doctrine was declared heretical, and the Council of Nicaea adopted the concept of the Holy Trinity, A description that Christ was 'of like essence' to God was also adopted at a synod in 358. In 381, the Council of Constantinople asserted the deity of the Holy Spirit and acknowledged the position taken at Nicaea that the Father and Son were of identical substance.
What was the decisions of the Council of Nicaea?
There were two councils of Nicaea - one in 325AD and another in 787AD. By far the more important was theFirst Council, an ecumenical council set up for various reasons but mainly to consolidate Christian thinking and to dispel heresies that sprang up within the Church - most of which were known to be wrong because many of the members of the Council could trace their teaching back to the apostles themselves.The main thrust of the Council was an ecumenical council set up to speak out against false teachings that had sprung up, notably Arianism, a doctrine that denied the divinity of Christ. Christ's divinity had been accepted right from the beginnings of the Church beginning with Paul's letters and teaching of the first Christian churches and also reflected in the Gospels and Acts. However, Arianism denied this and so it was necessary that all the churches meet to formalise Church teaching and doctrine. Heretical Arianism is still believed by some today, however, notably the Jehovah's Witnesses, whose founder Charles Taize Russell revisited Arianism and set up the Watchtower movement. That is one reason why Jehovah's Witnesses are not regarded as members of the Christian Church worldwide - they refuse to accept the divinity of Christ.The First Council therefore did not invent the deity of Christ; this doctrine had long existed in the Church and in the Roman Empire and it had long been widely endorsed by the Christian community of the otherwise pagan city of Rome. Instead, the council affirmed what it had found to be the teachings of the Apostles regarding who Christ is; that Christ is the one true God in Deity with the Father.To seal this, the Council drew up a statement of belief in the Nicene Creed which set out once and for all the beliefs of the Christian church. The worldwide Christian Church still uses this creed today. Copies of the Creed can be found online.In addition to this, the Council also tackled many other issues. These included an agreement of when to celebrate Easter as the first Sunday after the first full moon following the vernal equinox. Other issues included: prohibition of self-castration (practised by some pseudoChristian sects), rules surrounding the ordination of bishops, provision for two provincial synods to be held annually; authority acknowledged for the patriarchs of Alexandria and Rome, for their respective regions, and many other minor rules.The Second Council of Nicaea took place in 787AD and was primarily concerned with the restoration of the use of icons - the veneration of icons was abolished under Constantine V - although there were doubts cast on whether or not the council abolishing icons in the first place as well as the ruling that they could be restored were valid as neither council was truly ecumenical, and therefore many declared the rulings void.However, at no time, contrary to previous answers on this subject, was the role of the Virgin Mary as 'Queen of Heaven' discussed at either Council of Nicaea; this was a doctrine adopted by the Roman Catholic Church alone, along with the doctrine of the infallibility of the Pope, and decreed by Pope Pius XII in 1950 in his 'Munificentissimus Deus', much to the concerns and disdain of the rest of the Christian Church worldwide.
How did the Church answer Arius's claim that Son of God was not God but rather a created being with a definite origin in time?
Arius was a priest in Alexandria. At first, the Patriarch of Alexandria Alexander was so tolerant of the errors of Arius that the clergy nearly revolted. However, an Alexandrian synod of some 100 bishops condemned him in 321. He was excommunicated and fled to Palestine. The arguments between Arius and Patriarch Alexander continued in the form of letters and became a powerful force within the Roman empire, such that the emperor Constantine could no longer ignore it. To settle the arguments he called a council with delegates drawn from all the empire. The purpose of this, the First Council of Nicaea, was to determine as far as possible what had been taught from the beginning. The Council met in Nicaea, near Constantinople in 325. Here the confession of faith presented by Arius was cut to pieces. Then, under the guidance of Constantine, the Council developed a creed, the Nicaean Creed for use in catechetical instruction and at baptisms, that rendered Arius' language heretical. In 321, Arius was denounced by a synod at Alexandria for teaching a heterodox view of the relationship of Jesus to God the Father.
Was Jesus ' teaching on the Eucharist was readily accepted by all?
No, not by all. Some people found his teaching hard to accept and they left him based on their inability to accept it.
Why does Mary myrover accept a teaching job?
iiijjgg
Who did the Eastern Orthodox Church not accept the authority of?
Following the Council of Nicaea, the Church structure came under the ultimate authority of five Metropolitans - the bishops of Rome, Constantinople, Antioch, Alexandria and Carthage. However, successive bishops of Rome felt that they were first among equals, and eventually the undisputed leader of the Christian Church.The Eastern Orthodox Churches did not accept the authority of the bishop of Rome to insert the Filioque clause, which holds that the Father and the Son are equally divine, into the Nicene Creed without agreement by a Council.
How did Saint Athanasius help spread the faith?
Saint Athanasius was instrumental in defending the Faith of the Church at the Council of Nicaea. He defended the full divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ against the majority of the bishops who were Arian. Arianism denied the full divinity of Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ was a god, but not God. Saint Athanasius wrote many works which can be found at "New Advent." Because the majority of bishops were Arian, a dictum says "Athanasius against the word." It is because of Athanasius that the Truth of God prevailed at the Council of Nicea: Jesus Christ is "God from God, Light from Light, True God from True God." The Arian Faith continues today in the form of Jehovah Witnesses and Mormon's who do not accept that Jesus is God in the same sense that the Father is God. Many of their arguments are directly taken from the Arian heretics which have been answered by Saint Athanasius in his works.
How did Arianism affect the early Church?
Arianism arose at the start of the fourth century CE, when the Church was seeking to determine what they meant by Jesus as the Son of God and to define his divinity. Arius, a popular Libyan priest, declared that Christ, while divine, was not divine in the same way as God the Father. A fierce opponent, Bishop Alexander of Alexandria declared these views heretical and excommunicated Arius and the clergy who supported him. Both had their followers, and the Church had to decide which view was to be accepted as correct. The Church Father, Eusebius wrote to Alexander in support of the Arians and took part in a synod of Syrian bishops who restored Arius to his former position. Alexander had the wording that Christ was "of one being with God" adopted at Council of Nicaea. Constantine's son, Constantius, was keen for the Church to accept the Arian creed and pressured the bishops at Councils in Arles and Milan to adopt a formula that the Son was unlike the Father. This new position was called Dissimilarian and was opposed by a majority of Greek bishops, who held that Christ and God were of like essence. The conflict between Arianism and the Trinitarianism that has since become dominant was the first important doctrinal difficulty of the Church since Emperor Constantine gave it state patronage. One view is that the lasting divisions over Arianism weakened the Church in Syria and Egypt, creating a vacuum that Islam was able to fill.
What was the Arian heresy?
The late third century and early part of the fourth were a period in which members of the Church were trying to define the divinity of Jesus. Trinitarianism, the doctrine that would ultimately triumph, held that God the Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit were three persons in one God, equally divine. Arius, a popular Libyan priest, declared that Christ, while divine, was not divine in the same way as God the Father. Around 318, Alexander, bishop of Alexandria, declared heretical the views of Arius and had him, and the clergy who supported him, excommunicated. In order to fully exclude Arius, Alexander had the wording that Christ was "of one being with God" adopted at the Council of Nicaea. The Church Father Origen held somewhat similar views to those of Arius, and some later theologians condemned his views by association with those of Arius. Eusebius wrote to Alexander in support of the Arians, and a copy of this letter was cited at the second Council of Nicæa, to prove that Eusebius was a heretic. The conflict between Arianism and the Trinitarianism that was the first important doctrinal difficulty in the Church after the legalisation of Christianity by Emperor Constantine I. At one point in the conflict, Arianism held sway in the family of the Emperor and this could have resulted in it becoming the eventual truth, with the doctrine of the Holy Trinity relegated to heresy. It was not until the end of the fourth century that the emperor finally declared Arianism illegal.
Can you take college classes online for teaching?
Yes. However, some states will not accept teaching credentials that came from an online school. Check with your state before enrolling in a school.
Why did Mary myrover accept a teaching job?
Mary Myrover accepted the teaching job because she was passionate about education and wanted to make a positive impact on young minds. She saw teaching as a fulfilling way to contribute to society and help shape the future through education.
