Encyclopædia Dramatica is a collaborative website whose stated purpose is to provide a central catalog for the e-public to view parody and satire of "drama", memes, and other happenings on the internet. It has been described as a "snarky Wikipedia anti-fansite".
Encyclopedia Dramatica was created in 2004.
Encyclopedia Dramatica ended in 2011.
Encyclopædia Dramatica.
because he exploits his children on Youtube for profit.
The First Amendment.
Only if you feel the very powerful propelling need to have an account.
agnph rule34 yiffstar furaffinity furnation encyclopedia dramatica ecc...
Encyclopedia Dramitica is a place where learned folk can get together and discuss the popularity's of the internet. yes there are offending pages but no they are not illegal in anyway. If you are so against it just don't go on it.
I was just thinking. Anonymous needs to hack the hell of that website!
Yes, the "Offended" page on Encyclopedia Dramatica has been removed. The site has undergone changes over the years, and some content has been taken down due to legal issues and community guidelines.
You could try OhInternet or Uncyclopedia if you'd like, those are the best Websites I know for constant satire. But unfortunately they're not very good.
No. Criminal libel, and slander, is not lawful and not tolerated (certainly not by those libeled). The publication you refer to, and the content you believe may be libelous, has quite likely already met the test of lawfulness.added: Encyclopedia Dramatica is not a real encyclopedia, rather a website devoted to satire. However, the majority of the articles satirizing actual people are done strictly as to persecute the subject, usually because the original author holds a grudge against the person being satirized. The owners of the website do not care what is said, as long as an attempt at humor is made. Any attempts to get articles removed are met with derision and scorn, since the owners actually encourage libelous behavior. The content of Encyclopedia Dramatica has not met the test of lawfulness. It's lawfulness hasn't been tested at all.See Discussion Page: