Common knowledge doesn't have to be cited; but if you know the source it doesn't hurt to cite it as the definition of common knowledge is subjective.
___
It's not a good idea to overload your work with references to things that are 'common knowledge' and undisputed. It can be irritating if there are, for example, two references per line in an essay or paper, and it may even give readers the impression that you are nervous about the possibilty of being faulted for lack of references.
Global knowledge is the same as common knowledge.
Common knowledge - facts or knowledge widely known and undisputed.
Common Knowledge EP was created in 1997.
Expert Common Knowledge happened in 1992.
Expert Common Knowledge was created in 1992.
Common knowledge information does not need to be cited.
How does knowledge of common file types improve your ability to work with applications?
No, you do not have to cite common knowledge when writing a research paper. Common knowledge is information that is widely known and accepted as true, so it does not require a citation.
One thing that is not true about common knowledge is that it is always backed up by scientific evidence. Very often, common knowledge is just accepted because "everybody knows" that it is so. The fact is that much of what is called common knowledge is far more often an idea that has gained the status of knowledge not by being proven, but by repetition.
Not necessarily. But common knowledge is considered to be in the public domain.
What are the advantages of norm referenced testing?
What are the advantages of norm referenced testing?