answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

A secondary source is more helpful when you are looking for analysis, interpretation, or synthesis of information already presented in primary sources. It can provide additional context, perspective, or critical assessment of the primary sources.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

βˆ™ 6mo ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: When is a secondary source more helpful that a primary source?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Psychology

Why is secondary study analysis usually done prior to primary research?

Secondary data analysis is typically conducted before primary research to save time and resources. By first exploring existing data, researchers can identify gaps in knowledge and formulate more focused research questions. Additionally, analyzing secondary data can help researchers understand the current literature and provide context for their primary research.


Which is not a primary color redgreen blue or yellow?

Green is not a primary color. The primary colors are red, blue, and yellow.


Secondary groups typically involve more emotion than primary groups?

This statement is generally incorrect. Primary groups, such as family or close friends, typically involve stronger emotional bonds due to the personal and intimate nature of the relationships. Secondary groups, such as classmates or coworkers, are usually focused on specific tasks or goals and may not involve as much emotional connection.


What is the difference between primary and secondary motivation?

Primary motivation refers to the main driving force behind a person's actions or behaviors, usually related to fulfilling basic needs like food, shelter, safety, etc. Secondary motivation, on the other hand, involves more complex factors such as personal goals, values, desires, or aspirations that go beyond fulfilling basic needs.


May a primary source be biased?

Yes, primary sources can be biased because they are created by individuals who may have their own perspectives, agendas, or prejudices that can influence the information they present. It is important for researchers to critically evaluate the bias in primary sources and consider multiple perspectives when analyzing historical events or phenomena.

Related questions

When is a secondary source more helpful than a primary source?

When you are not an expert in the field being studied in the experiment


Why can a secondary source more helpful than a primary source?

They summarize conclusions about primary sources.


Is cherry primary or secondary source?

Its a primary source as it comes off a tree - cant get more primary than that


Explain the difference beteween primary sources of information and secondary sources of information.Identify which would be more helpful to you are looking for information concerning the animal that a?

a primary source would be first hand from an educated certified doctor or something like that. a secondary source would be information from someone...like me!


Is primary the most used source out of secondary and primary?

Primary is the source you can depend the most upon because it is the first source therefor it is used more often.


Why can a secondary source be more helpful than a primary source sometimes?

Answer this question… To evaluate the perspective of a witness to the event


Is a interview a secondary source?

Interviews are primary sources 'cause the interviewers are getting the information from the source.


What is one advantage a secondary source has over a primary source?

A secondary source summarizes complex subjects by synthesizing multiple sources.


Unlike a primary source a secondary source can be what-?

written or caused by someone who did not experience an event. from APEX


What device is used to increase or decrease the amount of voltage from a source to a load or from a primary source to a secondary source?

If the primary source is AC, then that's the job of a transformer. If the primary source is DC, then doing that requires considerably more complex electronics.


Is Richard III by William Shakespeare a secondary or primary source?

It's more like a tertiary source. Shakespeare got his information from the secondary source Holinshed's History, which is based primarily on the earlier secondary source written by Polydore Vergil. The original primary source is probably the account attributed to Sir Thomas More, who, if he was the author, must have had the information from elsewhere, as he was an infant when the events of Richard's reign took place.


What are primary and secondary sources and how do historians use them when researching different events in history?

A primary source is a person (or a record produced by a person) who was actually there, as a witness or a participant of the event in question. A secondary source is someone who obtained information from a primary source and who then wrote or spoke about it. Primary sources are the more authoritative, however they are not always available, and sometimes you have to settle for lesser sources.