answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

This is a fascinating question. Looking at his methods to do civil disobedience,

I would say that the main characteristic of them is turning the aggression of the British colonial power on itself.

He was a master at producing the effect of showing sheer, brute military force against a defenseless populace. The "prophet in rags" was able to show the restraining forces of police and military fighting against a non-enemy, the local peasants, without no weapons whatsoever.

This peaceful methods of non-violent resistance are indeed not using violence; what is surprising is that even not having one aggressive action, they are able to destroy military discipline and morale.

What is the fun of going to war if the enemy doesn't react? when there is absolutely no violent response, the use of force begins to be experienced as ridiculous, unnecessary and unjust.

This is what did the Brits in: to be seen as massacring unarmed civilians and thus depicted as sanguinary, cruel and stupidly violent destroyed troops' morale and forced them to drop their arms.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

6mo ago

Gandhi's use of nonviolent resistance was not passive-aggressive, but rather a strategic and principled approach to opposing British colonial rule in India. He believed in the power of love, truth, and nonviolence to bring about social and political change.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Was Gandhi passive-aggressive
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Psychology

How does General Smuts relate to Gandhi?

General Smuts was a prominent South African statesman and politician, known for his opposition to British imperialism. He and Gandhi interacted during the Indian independence movement, with Smuts initially being an adversary as he introduced discriminatory laws against Indian South Africans. However, their relationship evolved, with Gandhi engaging in negotiations to improve the rights of Indians in South Africa, leading to some concessions from Smuts.


Who are some people who have done good things for others?

Mother Teresa, Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., and Malala Yousafzai are some notable individuals who have made significant positive impacts on the lives of others through their humanitarian efforts and activism.


Difference between habits and character?

Habits are specific behaviors or routines that we regularly engage in, while character refers to the overall combination of qualities and traits that make up an individual's moral and ethical identity. Habits are more focused on actions and behaviors, while character reflects one's deeper values and beliefs.


Who are some great politicians that are responsible for global peace?

Some great politicians known for their role in promoting global peace include Nelson Mandela, who worked tirelessly to end apartheid in South Africa, and won the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts. Another notable figure is Mahatma Gandhi, whose nonviolent resistance played a significant role in India's independence movement and inspired peaceful movements around the world. Additionally, current leaders like Angela Merkel, who has been a key player in fostering unity and stability in Europe, and Ban Ki-moon, former Secretary-General of the United Nations, have also made significant contributions to global peace.


What is Kohlberg's theory of development of moral reasoning?

Has been criticized because it only looked at men and boys

Related questions