Want this question answered?
A Social-Darwinist defense for U.S. imperialism would argue that it is a natural expression of a dominant nation's right to expand its power and influence over weaker nations. This perspective would view imperialism as a means to establish superiority and ensure the survival of the fittest in the global arena. It may also justify imperialism as a way to spread progress and civilization to less developed societies.
Social Darwinism held that those made better or worse by industrialization were based on the natural predisposition of the people effected. For those who were made better off, the success of those people demonstrated that they had a well-evolved culture and this expansion would help remove or improve underperforming cultures, which were those "chosen" by the fact that they were performing poorly.All in all, according to the Social Darwinist, Imperialism was the natural expansion and success of a well-evolved culture and this expansion would help remove or improve underperforming cultures.
Same as Hitler or Stalin.
Social Darwinism is the political theory that believes that competition and struggle improves the economic realm by allowing unrestrained and ruthless competition. Roosevelt was a Darwinist when it came to internal affairs. He firmly believed that there was constant competition between America and the other countries.
Improving conditions for the working class
Improving conditions for the working class
Social Darwinism is the political theory that believes that competition and struggle improves the economic realm by allowing unrestrained and ruthless competition. Roosevelt was a Darwinist when it came to internal affairs. He firmly believed that there was constant competition between America and the other countries.
Yes, Social Darwinist ideas were used to justify policies of imperial expansion by suggesting that it was natural for stronger nations to dominate weaker ones. This concept was applied to justify the acquisition of resources and territories through military conquest.
To think that because something is natural makes that something good. Social Darwinist ( should be social Spencerism ) made this fundamental fallacy.
Social Darwinism held that those made better or worse by industrialization were based on the natural predisposition of the people effected. For those who were made better off, the success of those people demonstrated that they had a well-evolved culture and this expansion would help remove or improve underperforming cultures, which were those "chosen" by the fact that they were performing poorly.All in all, according to the Social Darwinist, Imperialism was the natural expansion and success of a well-evolved culture and this expansion would help remove or improve underperforming cultures.
Social conservatism and laissex-faire capitalism
social Darwinist' fears that immigrants would undermine American "racial purity."