We don't have the statements so can't answer. Since this is an apex item you need to read the article that goes with the question. Quit cheating and get to reading.
Identities are statements that are true for any number.
your mom and dad
kerala
Electronic voting machines were first introduced in Kerala.
Voting machines make it possible to calculate the election results more quickly. Voting machines also make it much easier to tamper with the election results, and to falsify the votes cast. Paper ballots are slower, but far more secure and tamper-resistant.
What are three statements that are true about Francis Drake?
The biggest disadvantage of electronic voting machines is the risk of security breach since it could be hacked by outsiders. There are many advantages including convenience, it is quick, and easy to use.
Electronic voting machines are used for voting, just as mechanical voting machines and paper ballots are. Because they are electronic they facilitate the rapid counting of the vote, and may even transmit their totals to a central Election Commission location without human intervention. If adequately secured and programmed, they may make vote tampering more difficult, but they cannot eliminate the possibility of tampering.
A voting machine is a machine used to record votes in an election without paper. There are different types of voting machines, such as: Mechanical voting machines: These use levers, dials, balls, buttons, or tokens to record votes mechanically. Optical scanning machines: These use a scanner to read marks on paper ballots and record votes electronically. Direct-recording electronic (DRE) machines: These use a touch screen or a keypad to record votes directly into a computer memory.
The biggest disadvantage of electronic voting machines is the risk of security breach since it could be hacked by outsiders. There are many advantages including convenience, it is quick, and easy to use.
While there are many precautions taken, there is a chance of electronic voting machines being hacked. Potentially, someone could change the results of an election.