To conduct, monitor and judge election and election related matters.
One result of winning a free election is the winner becomes the leader of that country. Another result is the losing side becomes determined to defeat him or her in the next election. And a third result is the voters who participated feel either joy (their candidate won) or disappointment (their candidate lost); however they feel, they know with certainty that there will be a future election and that their vote matters.
article 329. bar to interference by courts in electoral matters.
First, it should be noted that every four years, the side that loses accuses the side that wins of "rigging the election." But there is no credible evidence of this in the 2012 election. Barack Obama won the election by getting the most votes, not by any dishonesty at the polls.
Some states require an actual majority of the votes to win, while others will elect based on the largest plurality. In the states that require a majority to win, the top two candidates will face a runoff election generally about a month later.
Because it doesn't matter who votes; it matters who COUNTS the votes. Ballot tampering or voter fraud (typically, the "discovery" of a ballot box full of marked but uncounted ballots) is the fastest way to destroy the people's confidence in the validity of the election process. Americans will generally accept the results of an unfavorable election, as long as the voting process is perceived to be fair. Election fraud will taint the results of an election and the possibly-fraudulently elected official, for decades into the future.
The primary election date is important to set to see which candidates have the better chance of winning the presidential election and to save the other people their money so they won't waste it on ads and what not when the really have no chance in winning the election and to narrow down the candidates to see which one the Americans really want.
Americans were voting for who lived in their region, rather than who shared similar moral values. Also, all four canadites were from the same republican party, contributing to the growing sectionalism. source: i am currently in 10th grade ap us history
The Magna Carta of 1215AD
The members of the Lok Sabha are elected through General Elections, held on the basis of universal adult suffrage. Parliament, from time to time, by law makes provision with respect to all matters relating to, or in connection with, elections to the Lok Sabha, including the preparation of electoral rolls, the delimitation of constituencies and all other matters necessary for securing the due constitution of the Lok Sabha. When the seat of a member elected to the House becomes vacant or is declared vacant, or his/her election is declared void, the same is filled through bye-election.
In the United States campaign contributions are made to various candidates running for election or re election for official positions in the Federal, State and local governments. Supporters of the policies and voting records of candidates are accessed by campaign donors for the purpose of having officials who share the same goals with regards to public policies and legislation. There are at any given point in time a huge variety of public issues that need to be addressed. A donor to a campaign does not expect the candidate he or she supports to be in total agreement with each other. However there are certain issues which there is agreement. Thus the donor hopes that if his or her candidate is elected, certain matters of mutual concern will be addressed in a manner they agree upon.
Becase politics, as such, are not addressed in the Constitution. However, insofar as adjudicating actions arising from political matters (e.g.: the contested election of Bush v. Gore) the Court CAN arrive at judgments and decisions based on existing law and the Constitution as it is written. Arriving at a judgment on that election did NOT involve a political question, but a PROCEDURAL one.