Both Gandhi and Stalin were influential leaders in their own right, but their leadership styles were vastly different. Gandhi is often remembered for his nonviolent approach to achieving social and political change, while Stalin was known for his authoritarian rule and the use of violence to maintain power. Ultimately, the determination of who was a better leader is subjective and dependent on individual perspectives.
Subordinates under a democratic leader would likely perform better in the leader's absence because they feel empowered and motivated to take ownership of their work. In contrast, subordinates under an autocratic leader may lack the initiative or confidence to perform well without direct oversight and guidance. Democratic leaders tend to foster a sense of responsibility and trust among their team, leading to increased performance and autonomy.
When a corrupt leader dies or is replaced, there may be a period of uncertainty and instability in the country as power dynamics shift. The new leader will have the opportunity to address the corruption issues and implement reforms to restore trust and accountability in the government. It is crucial for the new leader to demonstrate transparency and commitment to combating corruption in order to rebuild confidence among the population and international community.
Empathy, humility, and kindness are qualities that can be seen as greater or superior than intelligence in many situations. These attributes can foster strong relationships, support collaboration, and contribute to a more harmonious and balanced society.
A benign patriarch is a father figure who is seen as kind, gentle, and caring within the family or community. He is someone who uses his authority in a positive and nurturing way, focusing on the well-being and happiness of those under his care.
Both the UK and the US have their own strengths and weaknesses, and what may be considered "better" is subjective and depends on individual preferences. The UK has a strong social welfare system and universal healthcare, while the US has a larger economy and more opportunities for career advancement. Ultimately, the comparison is complex and there is no definitive answer.
Stalin was the totalitarian leader of Russia, he was responsible for the genocide of numerous Russian Jews. He was an extremely aggressive leader. Gandhi stressed peace within India and he supported Indian independence while India was a British colony. Gandhi supported peaceful demonstrations and hated violence. Stalin and Gandhi were two extremely different leaders. While Stalin was killing people, Gandhi was peacefully protesting. Other than the time period in which they ruled there is very little to compare between the two.
He never wanted to be leader of the US; being the leader of the USSR was more than enough for him. And why he wanted thatjob? Ambition, pure and simple.
Lenin and Stalin gave the Soviet Union an autocratic (Totalitarian) Communist Government. Stalin kills more people than Lenin did. (Because Stalin is even more cruel than Lenin, who is somewhat more humane and Stalin took place as leader of USSR for nearly 30 years while Lenin died within 5 years after assumed as leader of USSR.)
Do it Gandhi style and talk it out!
I would have to say that Stalin was WAY worse than Czar Nicholas 2, although they were both bad.
no
Josef Stalin, a communist who is known for causing more deaths than Adolph Hitler!
he has proved to people that there is more than one way to approch problems. he approched problems non-violentlyand he was successful. although gandhi was assainated he has inspired people today by standing up for his believes and changing the world for better!
Joseph Stalin, who was in power from 1924 until his death in 1953, was the soviet leader who stayed in power the longest.
I really think he is becaus he is an overall better player I disagree , i think ronaldo is alot better than beckham but i dont think he could ever be a leader !
I don't know a single event that brought about Trotsky's death. If there was one, someone who understands better than I should explain it. Stalin had him assassinated because he was a political enemy and thorn in Stalin's side.
Joseph Stalin was the leader of the Soviet Union during World War II and he picked up many facts about atomic weapons that Roosevelt, because of old age, let slip out. With that knowledge, the Soviet Union became a superpower in the Cold War with a huge Stockholm of nuclear weaponry and armaments. He helped the Soviet Union a lot, although the Soviet Union eventually went under. What Russia (as it's called today) has more than the US are nuclear submarines. That's pretty much all.