Yes they did
-rimz
Wiki User
β 12y agoWiki User
β 11y agoabout 50 billion years ago they did grow.
No, the North Pole is a region covered in ice and snow, and does not have trees. The cold and harsh conditions of the Arctic make it difficult for trees to grow in that area.
No, there are no naturally occurring trees at the North Pole due to the harsh conditions such as extreme cold, permafrost, and lack of sunlight for much of the year. The Arctic landscape at the North Pole mainly consists of ice, snow, and tundra vegetation.
Because the climate further to the North pole gets colder. Therefore the trees cannot get the right amount of what they need to grow but still get what they need to grow. So still grow just not as much
It is an evergreen forest. Both poles grow only coniferous trees. The climates at both poles can only grow trees that do not lose their leaves.
The boreal forests that stretch across Russia, Canada, and Scandinavia contain the most trees globally. These forests consist mainly of coniferous trees like spruce, pine, and fir, and are known for their vast expanse of dense vegetation.
in the north pole
North Pole
-- To Palm Springs, California . . . 3,878 miles (rounded) -- To Palm Springs, Florida . . . . . 4,374 miles (rounded)
No plants grow in the North Pole because it is far too cold for anything to grow. Most plants need certain temperatures to sprout, along with soil.
North pole
pandas dont live in the north pole, and even if they did, bamboo doesn't grow there.
The north pole, along with penguins and ducks