Windmills are better than coal because they generate electricity without emitting harmful greenhouse gases like coal plants do. Wind energy is also renewable and abundant, reducing our dependence on finite fossil fuels and lowering air pollution levels. Additionally, windmills have lower operational costs and create more jobs in the clean energy sector.
Older windmills typically have a simpler design with smaller blades and lower efficiency compared to newer windmills. New windmills are larger and more advanced, with improved technology and taller towers to capture stronger winds at higher altitudes. Additionally, newer windmills can generate more electricity due to enhanced power conversion systems.
Windmills help us by converting the energy from the wind into electricity. This renewable energy source is clean and does not produce greenhouse gas emissions like fossil fuels. Windmills also help reduce our reliance on nonrenewable energy sources and contribute to a more sustainable energy future.
New windmills typically have larger blades and more advanced technology, allowing them to catch more wind compared to old windmills. The larger blades and improved design of new windmills enable them to generate more electricity efficiently.
No, coal is not a good conductor of electricity. It is considered an insulator rather than a conductor, as it does not allow the flow of electric current easily. Metals such as copper and aluminum are better conductors of electricity.
No, windmills and wind turbines are not the same thing. Windmills typically refer to older, traditional structures that use wind power to grind grain or pump water, while wind turbines are modern machines that convert wind energy into electricity. Wind turbines are larger and more efficient than windmills in generating power.
Is cols better than cola? did you mean: coal?did you mean: coal?i wouldn't recomend eating coal on a diet. And coal is not better than coal. Sorry. Coca-Cola isn't as good as Dr.Pepper
Coal IS a fossil fuel
If this is a question of green energy, then yes, solar power is better than coal because it is a renewable source. Coal is a fossil fuel that is non-renewable.
Coal emits more carbon dioxide pollution than natural gas does.
because coal has more energy intake ?..,
suck it
solar power because it better!!
Solar power is more environment friendly than coal power. Solar power is, however, more expensive than coal power.
Hydroelectricity emits far fewer pollutants (including carbon dioxide) than burning coal.
Burning oil produces fewer emissions and pollutants compared to coal, making it slightly better for the environment in terms of air quality. However, both oil and coal are fossil fuels that contribute to climate change, so transitioning to renewable energy sources is the most sustainable option.
Coal is not better than other energy sources. It is easy to dig up and cheap, if the company does not pay a carbon price, but it emits vast amounts of carbon dioxide which is causing global warming.Of the fossil fuels, natural gas is better than oil, and oil is better than coal, regarding their CO2 emissions, but they all pollute.Any renewable energy source is better, solar, hydro, wind, tidal, wave, geothermal and biofuel.
Windmills are better for the Earth because they generate electricity from wind, a renewable energy source that does not produce greenhouse gas emissions or air pollutants. Windmills contribute to decreasing our reliance on fossil fuels and help combat climate change by reducing carbon emissions. Additionally, windmills have a low carbon footprint compared to traditional energy sources.