What makes you think that it should decay precisely into an electron and a positron, rather than some other option?
Anyway, in any such particle conversion, certain quantities must be conserved. Some of these conservation laws are strict (no exceptions are known to exist), some not (now and then there is an exception). For the proposed reaction, you should consider the following conservation laws:
A free neutron does not decay into an electron and a positron because the total energy of the electron-positron pair would be greater than the total energy of the neutron. Conservation of energy prohibits this decay process from occurring spontaneously. Instead, a free neutron decays into a proton, an electron, and an antineutrino through the weak nuclear force.
Yes, beta particles are high-energy electrons or positrons that are emitted from the nucleus during a type of radioactive decay known as beta decay. These particles are released when a neutron changes into a proton (emitting an electron) or a proton changes into a neutron (emitting a positron) within the nucleus.
No, neutrons cannot be divided into protons and electrons. Neutrons are fundamental particles that are composed of three smaller particles called quarks. In contrast, protons are also fundamental particles and carry a positive charge, while electrons are negatively charged particles that orbit the nucleus of an atom.
Free neutrons decay via the weak force into a proton, electron, and neutrino with a half-life of about 15 minutes. Bound neutrons in atomic nuclei have a longer decay time because of the stabilizing effect of the strong nuclear force, which helps hold the neutron in the nucleus.
A beta particle is created when a neutron inside an unstable nucleus changes into a proton (or vice versa), losing energy and mass in the form of an electron (or positron), which is the beta particle.
The free electron theory assumes that electrons in a solid are completely free to move throughout the material, without any interaction with the crystal lattice. In contrast, the nearly free electron theory recognizes that there are some interactions between the electrons and the crystal lattice, leading to energy bands and band gaps in the electron's motion within the solid.
A free neutron decays into a proton, an electron and an electron neutrino (with a mean lifetime of about 15 minutes). Of these, the proton and electron are readily detectable. Neutrino detection is extraordinarily difficult.
Outside the nucleus, free neutrons are unstable and have a mean lifetime of 885.7±0.8 s (about 15 minutes), decaying by emission of a negative electron and antineutrino to become a proton: : n0 → p+ + e− + νe
A free neutron actually decays into a proton, and an electron and an antineutrino are ejected in the process. This is beta minus decay, and a free neutron is unstable and will decay by this mechanism. While it is true that a proton and an electron make up a hydrogen-1 atom, the decay of the neutron is slightly different. The reason is that the electron leaves the decay event with a high kinetic energy, and it cannot be "held" by the proton (to create the hydrogen atom). Certainly the proton will "pick up" an electron from somewhere after is slows down a bit following its creation, as it, too, has some kinetic energy. The proton will have to release that kinetic energy through scattering, just like the electron that left the event. Links can be found below to related questions with descriptive answers.
Yes, beta particles are high-energy electrons or positrons that are emitted from the nucleus during a type of radioactive decay known as beta decay. These particles are released when a neutron changes into a proton (emitting an electron) or a proton changes into a neutron (emitting a positron) within the nucleus.
when the 2 Hydrogen nuclei fuse, one of the protons is changed to a neutron via beta + decay, this produces an atom of Deuterium, a positron (beta + particle) and a neutrino. This positron will only travel a short distance before contacting an electron and annihilating each other to convert their masses and kinetic energies into the energy of the photons. The electron is most probably a free electron, as the high temperatures involved in Nuclear fusion would have provided enough energy to ionise electrons from their parent atom.
a neutron's location in an atom is in the core, or nucleus, of that atom.Where_is_the_neutrons_location_in_the_atom
A neutron is made of 3 quarks, namely an up quark and two down quarks. It is this composition of quarks that cause it to have zero charge. (An up quark has a charge of 2/3 and down quarks have a charge of -1/3 - thus 2/3 + (-1/3 *2) = 0) A free neutron (that is one that is not bound in a nucleus) will become a proton, an electron and an electron-neutrino. This happens through the weak force (it acts on a down quark, turning into an up). This does not mean a neutron contains an electron. It does not. Yes, an electron appears when a neutron decays, but that electron does not exist in the neutron as an electron, but it does not.
Because energy mass conservation will not be satisfied in free space, so that this process needs some material by which this conversion will be proceed.
The heaviest elements come mainly from supernovae. Iron is the heaviest element that can be produced by fusion. Heavier elements are produced by neutron capture. An individual free-floating neutron collides with a nucleus and merges with it. That doesn't produce a higher element on the periodic table, because the atomic number depends on the number of protons. However, nuclei with too many neutrons are unstable, and will eventually "decay". A neutron will decay into a proton and an electron. Free neutrons don't exist in great numbers in normal stars, so neutron capture doesn't happen significantly in them. Elements from carbon to iron can be formed by fusion in large stars.
No, the proton and neutron don't have the same mass. A neutron is about 1.00138 times as heavy as a proton. The neutron is just a bit bigger, as you can see, and when a free neutron decays, it releases a proton and an electron. It might be said that a proton plus an electron equals a neutron, but you might not be able to get a physicist to say that. Links can be found below for more information.
Proton and NeutronOK, in very very round figures, but the neutron actually is more massive.In the first approximation, the neutron's mass about as much as a proton plus one electron or (P)938.235 MeV + (e)0.51098 MeV = 938.74598 MeV.In the second approximation, the energy of the neutrino, photon, and electron velocities ejected in free neutron beta decay would be added, but I can't find that in my references right now so I'll skip the math.There are probably also third approximation terms to account for, if not more.As measured, the neutron's mass is 939.529 MeV.
Proton and NeutronOK, in very very round figures, but the neutron actually is more massive.In the first approximation, the neutron's mass about as much as a proton plus one electron or (P)938.235 MeV + (e)0.51098 MeV = 938.74598 MeV.In the second approximation, the energy of the neutrino, photon, and electron velocities ejected in free neutron beta decay would be added, but I can't find that in my references right now so I'll skip the math.There are probably also third approximation terms to account for, if not more.As measured, the neutron's mass is 939.529 MeV.