The statement that is consistent with the results of Rutherford's gold foil experiment is that atoms are mostly empty space with a dense, positively charged nucleus at the center. Rutherford's experiment showed that most of the alpha particles passed through the foil undeflected, indicating that the nucleus is small and concentrated.
Repeating an experiment helps to ensure the results are reliable and not just due to chance. Consistent results across multiple trials strengthen the conclusions drawn from the study and increase confidence in the findings.
Results that are consistent or reproducible across multiple trials are considered reliable in an experiment. These results should not change regardless of any variations in experimental conditions or procedures. Additionally, results that align with the expected outcomes based on the hypothesis and theoretical framework also typically remain constant.
The hypothesis predicts the answer to a scientific experiment. It is a testable statement that guides the research process and can be either supported or rejected based on the results.
In a soccer experiment, constants could include factors such as the size of the field, the type of ball used, the duration of the match, and the rules of the game. These are elements that do not change throughout the experiment and are kept consistent to ensure reliable results.
Repeatability is crucial for an experiment to ensure that the results are consistent and reliable. By allowing other researchers to replicate the experiment and obtain the same results, it helps to validate the findings and ensure that they are not due to chance or errors. Additionally, repeatability allows for further testing and refinement of the experiment, contributing to the overall understanding and advancement of the scientific knowledge in that area.
The most surprising fact about Rutherford's experiment is that some of the atoms bounced backwards while others scattered.
The gold foil experiment supported the statement that atoms have a small, positively charged nucleus at their center. This overturned the previous "plum pudding" model of the atom, where positive charge was thought to be spread throughout the atom.
That is not a statement it is a question
No
false
Repeating an experiment helps to ensure the results are reliable and not just due to chance. Consistent results across multiple trials strengthen the conclusions drawn from the study and increase confidence in the findings.
Results that are consistent or reproducible across multiple trials are considered reliable in an experiment. These results should not change regardless of any variations in experimental conditions or procedures. Additionally, results that align with the expected outcomes based on the hypothesis and theoretical framework also typically remain constant.
No, I believe that would be a hypothesis. A prediction would be forecasting the unknown without the assistance of the results.
Religion is important during an experiment because it tells you if the results are consistent. If you didn't repeat portions of the experiment, than you wouldn't be able to gain accurate results.
The hypothesis predicts the answer to a scientific experiment. It is a testable statement that guides the research process and can be either supported or rejected based on the results.
In a soccer experiment, constants could include factors such as the size of the field, the type of ball used, the duration of the match, and the rules of the game. These are elements that do not change throughout the experiment and are kept consistent to ensure reliable results.
Retesting an experiment can help verify the results and ensure they are consistent and reliable. It also allows for any errors or inconsistencies to be identified and corrected. By repeating the experiment, you can increase the validity and confidence in the findings.