0
There is no such thing as an unstoppable force, or an immovable object. Things like nuclear explosions or planets come close, but not close enough.
AnswerThis is known as the 'Irresistible Force Paradox'.
An irresistible force would have to possess (effectively) infinite energy, which is impossible for a finite universe. Also, for a universe in which irresistible forces are possible, immovable objects would not be (therein lies the crux of the paradox). For the sake of the question, we would also have to assume that both are indestructible, subverting the obvious answer that both would be destroyed.
This is related to the 'Omniscience Paradox' - the question "can God create a stone that is too heavy for even Him to lift?"
If an irresistible force meets an immovable object, the immovable object moves and the irresistible force stops. This is one rational answer for an irrational question.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Professor
Judy
Blake
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What were to happen if an immovable object was collided by an unstoppable force?
This scenario poses a paradox because it assumes the existence of two contradictory concepts - an immovable object and an unstoppable force. In reality, both cannot coexist, so the outcome is undefined or illogical. Physics does not provide a definitive answer to this hypothetical situation.
What happens when an irresistable force meets an immovable object?
This classic paradox poses a hypothetical scenario where contradictory conditions exist. If an irresistible force exists, it should be able to overcome any resistance, but if an immovable object exists, it cannot be moved by any force. In reality, it is impossible for both concepts to coexist, as their definitions would cancel each other out.
What happens when an unstopable force meets an immobile object?
It's a paradox known as the "unstoppable force paradox" and it challenges the idea that both an unstoppable force and an immovable object can exist simultaneously. It's a thought experiment that raises questions about the fundamental laws of physics and what would happen in such a scenario.
What would happen if an irresistible force met an immovable object?
This scenario is considered a paradox, as an irresistible force cannot exist alongside an immovable object in classical physics. It raises questions about the nature of the concept of an immovable object and an irresistible force.
Who would win-an immovable object or an unstoppable force?
This is a classic paradoxical question. If the object is truly immovable, then the force cannot move it. Similarly, if the force is truly unstoppable, then the object cannot prevent it from moving. It's a situation where both possibilities contradict each other, leading to an unsolvable outcome.
