A gigaton is 1000 megatons so it would be destroy an an area the size of Louisiana. But of course there is no such thing as a gigaton for bombs.
IN FACT, there are already 1+ gigaton nuclear weapons. A 1 GT bomb would destroy an area the size of Texas, just with the expansive wave. A 90 GT bomb could change the planet trajectory.
A 90 Gigaton nuclear bomb would be immensely powerful, likely causing catastrophic damage over a wide area. The blast would produce a massive fireball, intense heat, and destructive shockwave, leading to widespread destruction and loss of life. The resulting radiation fallout would also pose significant long-term health and environmental risks.
No, a nuclear reactor cannot explode like a nuclear bomb. The design and process within a nuclear reactor are different from those in a nuclear bomb. In a reactor, the control systems prevent the conditions needed for a nuclear explosion to occur.
The range of destruction for a nuclear bomb depends on its size and type. A large nuclear bomb like the ones developed during the Cold War could cause destruction over several miles, while smaller tactical nuclear weapons might have a smaller range of destruction. The blast radius, thermal radiation, and nuclear fallout are all factors that contribute to the range of destruction of a nuclear bomb.
One nuclear bomb has the capability to cause significant destruction to a city like New York, depending on the size and location of the blast. The extent of damage would also be influenced by factors such as the type of bomb, altitude of detonation, and prevailing weather conditions. The impact would likely be catastrophic, resulting in widespread devastation and loss of life.
Well, there are two types of Nuke, A bomb and a missile or commonly referred to as 'Nuclear Bomb' and 'Nuclear Warhead (or missile)'. It looks like a standard bomb in shape but not size. But there are two versions of Nuclear bomb, Fission and Fusion. The Fission one is more like a standard bomb but larger and the Fusion one looks like a Mini-Missile but is still dropped like a bomb. The Nuclear Warhead (or missile) looks like a missile obviously. The easiest way to answer this question is to look on Google Images and next time you wonder something like this, Please, Don't waste the good people's time to answer your stupidity and minor amount of common sense.
No, the hydrogen bomb, also known as a thermonuclear bomb, is more powerful than a nuclear bomb. A hydrogen bomb derives its energy from the fusion of hydrogen isotopes, whereas a nuclear bomb relies on fission of heavy atoms like uranium or plutonium. This fusion reaction in a hydrogen bomb releases far more energy, making it more powerful.
No, a nuclear reactor cannot explode like a nuclear bomb. The design and process within a nuclear reactor are different from those in a nuclear bomb. In a reactor, the control systems prevent the conditions needed for a nuclear explosion to occur.
The range of destruction for a nuclear bomb depends on its size and type. A large nuclear bomb like the ones developed during the Cold War could cause destruction over several miles, while smaller tactical nuclear weapons might have a smaller range of destruction. The blast radius, thermal radiation, and nuclear fallout are all factors that contribute to the range of destruction of a nuclear bomb.
One nuclear bomb has the capability to cause significant destruction to a city like New York, depending on the size and location of the blast. The extent of damage would also be influenced by factors such as the type of bomb, altitude of detonation, and prevailing weather conditions. The impact would likely be catastrophic, resulting in widespread devastation and loss of life.
Edward Teller proposed building a 10 gigaton fusion bomb. Such a bomb could easily destroy everything in any of one of the small eastern states (e.g. Rhode Island, Delaware, New Jersey, Vermont). A 5 to 10 megaton fusion bomb could destroy large cities like New York, Chicago, Oakland. Even the ~20 kiloton fission bombs of WW2 destroyed typical cities (except their outskirts) in Japan. So, yes.
No. That's like asking if a nuclear bomb is good for you.
like any other factory.
First of all, EMPs don't really explode like a nuclear bomb. It releases alot of energy like a nuclear bomb. EMP's do not affect the body... that much.
Hiroshima was nearly totally destroyed by the atom bomb.
Like a nuclear bomb exploded in japan.
Well, there are two types of Nuke, A bomb and a missile or commonly referred to as 'Nuclear Bomb' and 'Nuclear Warhead (or missile)'. It looks like a standard bomb in shape but not size. But there are two versions of Nuclear bomb, Fission and Fusion. The Fission one is more like a standard bomb but larger and the Fusion one looks like a Mini-Missile but is still dropped like a bomb. The Nuclear Warhead (or missile) looks like a missile obviously. The easiest way to answer this question is to look on Google Images and next time you wonder something like this, Please, Don't waste the good people's time to answer your stupidity and minor amount of common sense.
No, the hydrogen bomb, also known as a thermonuclear bomb, is more powerful than a nuclear bomb. A hydrogen bomb derives its energy from the fusion of hydrogen isotopes, whereas a nuclear bomb relies on fission of heavy atoms like uranium or plutonium. This fusion reaction in a hydrogen bomb releases far more energy, making it more powerful.
A nuke is a colloquial term for a nuclear weapon, which is an explosive weapon that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions. A nuclear weapon can come in various forms, such as a bomb or a missile, and may vary in size and design depending on its intended use and delivery method.