Wiki User
∙ 6y agoThe least likely outcome after conducting an experiment to test a hypothesis is the complete absence of any findings or results. Experiments are designed to provide insight or data, so it is rare for an experiment to yield no information whatsoever.
The least likely outcome of his stage jump would be landing perfectly without any injuries or mishaps.
he will become an addict
A manual can opener is least likely to have an energy guide label since it does not consume electricity and thus does not require an energy efficiency rating.
When scientists have to redo an experiment, it typically means that there were inconsistencies, errors, or unexpected results in the original experiment. Redoing the experiment allows them to troubleshoot, validate the findings, or ensure the reliability of the data before drawing conclusions. It is an essential part of the scientific process to confirm results and ensure accuracy.
Using pressure tactics is least likely to result in target commitment, as the target may feel coerced or manipulated into agreeing. This can lead to resentment and lack of genuine buy-in from the target. Building a trusting relationship and using persuasion tactics are more likely to result in target commitment.
i like 69 in the but
You have different kinds of methods for doing the a simple experiment in science. You need a prediction materials Observation Procedure and hypothesis for the experiment you do. 1st you make a prediction gather all the materials for your experiment and you start follow the experiment and last but not the least you have to check your hypothesis and prove it.........
There is no 7th step only 5 scientific method steps they are; problem,hypothesis,experiment,data,conclusion. You always need to have a problem to focus on. The hypothesis is very important, a hypothesis is a educated guess to test if your theory OS correct. You need to conduct a experiment to see if your hypothesis is correct. You need to collect data to back up your hypothesis. And last but my least a conclusion to prove if your hypothesis is right or wrong
If I understand the question correctly, ALL of them can change...In principal. That is, a scientific law could be proved false, though it is the most tested of theories and least likely to be changed. That is the beauty of science. Nothing is beyond question. Let's review a layman definition of these terms: Hypothesis --> Reasonable, but not fully tested, guess to answer a question. Theory --> A fully tested hypothesis that's been checked by others to a question. Law --> A theory that's been around a while that no one can find fault with. Experiment --> Logical process to test a hypothesis...They are changed ALL the time.
The scientific method is a way to answer a question by making observations, designing an experiment, and collecting and analyzing the data. The steps are: ask a question, do background research, determine a hypothesis, design and test an experiment, collect the data, analyze the data, and draw a conclusion. If the hypothesis is correct, report your data. If it's false, construct a new hypothesis to test. Note that your experiment should have at least three trials to ensure as accurate results as possible.
Blue, study island
There are at least 2 ways: 1.Accidents. Often scientists will stumble upon new phenomena as they are attempting to prove or disprove something else. The new and unexplained phenomena ends up being more scientifically relevant than what they are initially trying to prove. An example of this would be Marie Curie accidentally discovering radium, or Percy LeBaron accidentally discovering that microwaves can be used to heat materials. 2.The Scientific Method (hypothesis testing). In hypothesis testing, a scientist will establish a hypothesis, then test his theory to determine if the hypothesis is true or false. He often uses a control group to compare his experiment to, to determine if the results of the experiment were substantial enough to prove the hypothesis. Hypothesis testing relies on accurate and detailed observation, measuring, and recording of data. New information comes about when a scientist has proven or disproven a hypothesis. An example of a famous hypothesis test would be Galileo's experiments with gravity on the leaning tower of Pisa. Galileo hypothesized that a heavier object would fall faster than a lighter object. He conducted an experiment in which he dropped two objects of different weights simultaneously to see which hit the ground first. He recorded the data, and repeated the experiment several times until he was sure of the results. The new knowledge that he gained was that any two objects would hit the ground simultaneously, regardless of weight.
It can be proven, you have to do at least 3 experiments to prove your hypothesis.
A scientific theory is an experiment that still needs to be tested, but is believed to be true. A hypothesis is a fact and data based guess as to what the result(s) of an experiment will be. A scientific law is proven to be true and states that the results of the experiment will always be the same, and needs no further testing. An example of a scientific theory is the cell theory, which states that all living things are composed of at least one cell and that cells come from other cells.
A valid experiment is the one which is done on the basis of some facts and figures. The experiment which has a good statistical analysis is known to be valid experiment.step 3.
An evolutionary biologist is least likely to collect data by doing controlled experiments. Evolutionary biologists study living organisms through the lens of evolutionary theory.
A hypothesis is typically written as an "If-then" statement, where you propose a cause-and-effect relationship between two variables. It should be specific, testable, and clearly state the expected outcome of the study or experiment.