answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

There were two planes at different times the same day, September 11, 2001. The planes did not fall on the towers. They were deliberatley flown into the towers by Muslim extremists and they were ordered to do so by Osama bin Laden.

User Avatar

Wiki User

βˆ™ 13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

βˆ™ 7mo ago

The forces acting upon the twin towers were primarily gravity, wind loads, and the impact of the airplanes on 9/11. These forces caused structural damage and ultimately led to the collapse of the towers.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

βˆ™ 14y ago

gravity

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What forces were acting upon the twin towers?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Physics

Is it possible for an object at rest to have forces acting upon it?

Yes, an object at rest can still have forces acting upon it. These forces may include gravitational forces, normal forces, frictional forces, or applied forces. These forces can either be balanced, resulting in the object remaining at rest, or unbalanced, causing the object to start moving.


What occurs when forces acting upon a body are not balance?

When forces acting on a body are unbalanced, the body will experience acceleration in the direction of the net force. This acceleration causes the body to change its velocity, resulting in motion. The body will continue to accelerate until the forces acting upon it become balanced.


If a book remains stationary on a table are the forces acting upon the book in equilibrium what is the resultant of the force acting upon the book?

Yes, if a book is stationary on a table, the forces acting on it are in equilibrium. The resultant force acting on the book would be zero, as the forces are balanced and there is no net force causing any acceleration or movement.


Is it possible for an object to not be in motion and still have forces acting on it?

Yes, it is possible for an object to not be in motion and still have forces acting on it. This situation could occur if the forces acting on the object are balanced, resulting in a state of equilibrium where there is no net force causing motion.


Which is a result of opposing forces acting upon one another?

Equilibrium, where the opposing forces are balanced and no change occurs.

Related questions

What external forces act upon the taj mahal?

Wind is one of the forces acting on the structure especially for the 4 towers on the outside of taj mahal


What do you get when you combine all the forces acting upon an object?

The net force acting on the object.


What happens to an object if the forces acting upon it are unbalanced?

It moves.


Is it possible for an object at rest to have forces acting upon it?

Yes, an object at rest can still have forces acting upon it. These forces may include gravitational forces, normal forces, frictional forces, or applied forces. These forces can either be balanced, resulting in the object remaining at rest, or unbalanced, causing the object to start moving.


Is it possible for an object not to be in motion and still have a force acting on it?

Yes, the object can have equal forces acting in opposite directions: 5N ->[]<- 5N The object will have forces acting upon it, but will not move.


What occurs when forces acting upon a body are not balance?

When forces acting on a body are unbalanced, the body will experience acceleration in the direction of the net force. This acceleration causes the body to change its velocity, resulting in motion. The body will continue to accelerate until the forces acting upon it become balanced.


What occurs forces acting upon a body are not balanced?

The body accelerates.


When is something weightless?

Something is weightless when there are no gravitational forces acting upon it.


If a book remains stationary on a table are the forces acting upon the book in equilibrium what is the resultant of the force acting upon the book?

Yes, if a book is stationary on a table, the forces acting on it are in equilibrium. The resultant force acting on the book would be zero, as the forces are balanced and there is no net force causing any acceleration or movement.


Is it possible for an object to not be in motion and still have forces acting on it?

Yes, it is possible for an object to not be in motion and still have forces acting on it. This situation could occur if the forces acting on the object are balanced, resulting in a state of equilibrium where there is no net force causing motion.


Which is a result of opposing forces acting upon one another?

Equilibrium, where the opposing forces are balanced and no change occurs.


What forces are acting upon a feather in the air?

Air resistance(AKA drag), gravity