No,there isn't any scientific evidence that ghosts are real.
Anything unexplained is a knowledge gap. For instance, if I know that a mirror was broken in my bathroom while I slept, but don't know how it broke, the "how it broke" is a knowledge gap. Most "evidence" of ghosts or God, or anything supernatural, comes from a knowledge gap. I could say a ghost has broken my mirror. If later I fill this gap (maybe I learn that my home was burglarized that night) then this "evidence" that a ghost was in my home has vanished as the gap has vanished. Apart from unexplained matters, there are wrongly explained matters. For example, if I use a Ouija board to contact the dead, I might believe that when the board spells out a phrase such as "I broke your mirror," that I have spoken with the dead. But in reality, I have moved the glass, but not on a conscious level. If you don't believe me, try an experiment. Get a Ouija board. Fabricate a story and tell it to two people as if it were the truth. For example, you might invite two friends over to use your Ouija board and you might tell them that you are annoyed because a spirit has broken your mirror, and want to know the spirit's name and why he did it. If your friends receive a response to your fabricated story, you will know that it can't be a s true confession of a spirit. You will know that such an explanation would be a "wrong" explanation.
There is no scientific evidence that proves the existence of ghosts. Reports of ghost sightings and experiences are largely based on personal anecdotes and beliefs, which can vary greatly from one person to another. Without concrete, reproducible evidence, the existence of ghosts remains a matter of personal interpretation and belief.
There is no scientific evidence to support the existence of ghosts or their ability to physically interact with humans. Any reports of ghostly activity should be regarded as personal experiences rather than verifiable occurrences.
Frightening, spectral, eerie, translucent, ghastly, transparent, and incorporeal are real good ones.
There is no definitive proof or scientific evidence that ghosts exist, let alone have the ability to harm or kill other ghosts. Ghosts are part of folklore and myths, so any claims about their abilities are purely speculative and not based on concrete evidence.
There is no scientific evidence to prove the existence of ghosts, so it is not possible to know if a ghost is in the room. Belief in the presence of ghosts is a personal and subjective experience.
No. There is no evidence of the existence of ghosts or any other 'supernatural' phenomena.
There is no scientific evidence proving that ghosts exist.
apparently if there is a ghost haunting you then it is real but if your friends tell you about their ghost then tell them that you need evidence... yep, just dont make them mad, or your wish you hadn't
Just as there is no evidence for the existence of God, so there is no evidence for the existence of the Holy Ghost. It is a matter of faith, and faith alone.
THIS IS THE ORANGE GROUP FROM MS.SANSING CLASS AT LAVIZZO ELEMENTARY .THE ANSWER WE PICKED FOR THE QUESTION IS THAT JODI THINKS THE GHOST WAS BAD BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT MR.HOGARTH CALLED THE GHOST CAT AFTER HE STARVED HER,DROWNED HER AND THEN TOLD HER SHE WAS BAD.
It depends on if you have the gift to see ghosts.
ghost are real
Ghosts are NOT real
Of course
There has been evidence of ghosts but i do not believe that they are any serious threat.
No, nor is there any definitive evidence that ghosts exist.
No. There is no definitive evidence that ghosts exist, though many people believe they do.