No, a pendulum is an example of dynamic equilibrium because it is constantly moving back and forth while staying balanced. Static equilibrium refers to a system that is at rest and not moving.
A body is in equilibrium when the net force acting on it is zero, meaning all external forces are balanced and there is no acceleration. This can occur when the body is either at rest or moving at a constant velocity in a straight line.
A body moving with uniform velocity is not in equilibrium because it is experiencing a constant change in position. Equilibrium is achieved when the net force acting on the body is zero, resulting in no acceleration. In this case, the body is not at rest and therefore not in equilibrium.
In equilibrium, the net force acting on the body is zero, meaning that the body is either at rest or moving at a constant velocity. Additionally, the sum of all torques acting on the body is zero, indicating rotational equilibrium.
When a body is in equilibrium, it means that the net force acting on it is zero and the body is either at rest or moving at a constant velocity. This can occur when the sum of all external forces and torques acting on the body is balanced.
yes
No, a pendulum is an example of dynamic equilibrium because it is constantly moving back and forth while staying balanced. Static equilibrium refers to a system that is at rest and not moving.
A body is in equilibrium when the net force acting on it is zero, meaning all external forces are balanced and there is no acceleration. This can occur when the body is either at rest or moving at a constant velocity in a straight line.
yes
A body moving with uniform velocity is not in equilibrium because it is experiencing a constant change in position. Equilibrium is achieved when the net force acting on the body is zero, resulting in no acceleration. In this case, the body is not at rest and therefore not in equilibrium.
In equilibrium, the net force acting on the body is zero, meaning that the body is either at rest or moving at a constant velocity. Additionally, the sum of all torques acting on the body is zero, indicating rotational equilibrium.
Rest implies stationary, equilibrium implies a resultant force of zero. Therefore, a body in equilibrium could be moving, for example a sky diver at terminal velocity, where resistive forces are equal to the force of gravity. This means that a body can be in equilibrium and not at rest, but a body at rest MUST be in equilibrium, otherwise it would move. So, to answer the question is: It's impossible.
Consider two equal and opposite forces acting along different lines of the body, which causes the body to rotate, although first condition is fulfilled but body is still moving. Thus, we need another condition for equilibrium that is the second condition of equilibrium.
It means there are no unbalanced forces, or the net force is zero. That means if a t rest it will stay at rest, or if in motion it will stay in motion with no acceleration.It means that there is no net force acting on the object(s). A body moving at constant velocity is in mechanical equilibrium. A body that is not moving is in static equilibrium.
When a body is in equilibrium, it means that the net force acting on it is zero and the body is either at rest or moving at a constant velocity. This can occur when the sum of all external forces and torques acting on the body is balanced.
No, an object cannot be in equilibrium if it is moving. Equilibrium is a state where the net forces acting on an object are balanced and there is no acceleration. If an object is moving, there must be an unbalanced force acting on it causing its motion.
A body is in complete equilibrium when the net force acting on it is zero and the net torque around any point is also zero. This means the body is at rest or moving at a constant velocity with no rotations occurring.