Nuclear energy from uranium fission is not inexhaustible, because there is only a certain amount on Earth and we cannot recreate or manufacture it. There might be supplies elsewhere in the solar system but we don't know. If nuclear fusion can be successfully developed, and this uses deuterium from the oceans, then there would indeed be an almost inexhaustible source of energy, at least there is plenty there to last mankind for many thousands of years. (That does not make it renewable though!)
Yes, nuclear energy can be classified as essentially inexhaustible because it is derived from nuclear fuel sources such as uranium and thorium that are abundant in the Earth's crust. While these resources are finite, they are considered to be sufficient for thousands of years at current consumption rates.
Nuclear energy is not inherently inexhaustible. While the fuel sources used for nuclear power, such as uranium, are abundant, they are finite resources. However, advancements in nuclear technology and fuel recycling have the potential to extend the availability of nuclear energy.
Wind energy is considered inexhaustible, making it a sustainable resource for generating electricity.
The bonds between the protons of a silver atom are classified as nuclear binding energy. This energy arises from the strong nuclear force that holds the protons together in the nucleus of the atom.
Research data comparing the cost of nuclear energy to other energy sources, and studies confirming the abundance of nuclear fuel sources would be strong evidence to support the claim that nuclear energy is a cheap and inexhaustible source of electricity. Additionally, historical data showcasing the successful use of nuclear energy in providing affordable electricity for sustained periods would also bolster this assertion.
Two inexhaustible energies are solar energy and wind energy. Solar energy is derived from the sun and is constantly replenished, while wind energy is generated by the movement of air masses driven by the sun's uneven heating of the Earth's surface. Both sources are renewable and sustainable for the long term.
6
6
Energy from the sun is classified as renewable, inexhaustible....
Nuclear energy is a non-renewable source since there is a very tiny amount of Uranium-235, whose fission results in nuclear energy. If a more abundant element could be used in nuclear reactors, such as, say, nitrogen or oxygen, it would effectively become inexhaustible. However, current technology does not allow for this since these atoms are too small to be accurately and repetitively bombarded (which is a key part of the fission process).
Yes, it could be viewed as inexhaustible through use of breeder nuclear reactors that can produce more fuel that what is consumed.
Nuclear energy is not inherently inexhaustible. While the fuel sources used for nuclear power, such as uranium, are abundant, they are finite resources. However, advancements in nuclear technology and fuel recycling have the potential to extend the availability of nuclear energy.
The sun is an inexhaustible source of energy because it undergoes nuclear fusion reactions in its core, converting hydrogen into helium and releasing massive amounts of energy in the process. Given the sun's vast size and abundant fuel supply, it will continue to generate energy through nuclear fusion for billions of years to come.
Examples of inexhaustible resources include solar energy, wind energy, and tidal energy. These resources are constantly replenished by natural processes and will not run out even with extensive use.
Wind energy is considered inexhaustible, making it a sustainable resource for generating electricity.
inexhaustible and renewable
Nuclear power is non-renewable
No. nothing is inexhaustible except perhaps the energy of the vacuum.