No, there aren't enough countries with nuclear warheads to cause an apocalypse and no country even matches up to the United States nuclear bombs besides Russia and they have nukes from the 1960 so they don't even really pose a threat because they probably won't even work. Honestly though you don't have to work because if a nuke was fired the U.S. would stop take care of it. I am not saying that were almighty but we are the world SUPERPOWER! and we take of stuff like that. Thats why Iran won't wipe Israel of the map because they know they would be screwed like wise with Israel.
A nuclear bomb detonation can cause widespread destruction and loss of life on a catastrophic scale. However, for an apocalypse to occur, it would likely require multiple nuclear bombs detonating simultaneously in different locations around the world, leading to a global catastrophe beyond the capacity for society to recover.
No, a bomb is not necessarily a nuclear reaction. A bomb can be any device that is designed to explode and cause destruction, whereas a nuclear reaction involves the splitting or combining of atomic nuclei to release energy. Nuclear bombs, also known as atomic bombs, utilize nuclear reactions to produce a very powerful explosion.
An atom bomb is a type of nuclear weapon that releases immense amounts of energy by splitting atoms through a process called nuclear fission. This results in a powerful explosion that can cause widespread destruction.
A nuclear bomb and an atomic bomb are virtually synonymous. The two terms are both used to refer to a nuclear weapon. Even Wikipedia agrees. The use of either term as a search argument redirects the answer to the article Nuclear Weapon. A link is provided. from benjaminmarkiewicz that dont make any sense a nuclear bombs blow travels 100s of miles and is more powerful cause its the newly invented bomb and the atomic bombs blow travel is under a nuclear bombs travel rate
No, a nuclear reactor cannot explode like a nuclear bomb. The design and process within a nuclear reactor are different from those in a nuclear bomb. In a reactor, the control systems prevent the conditions needed for a nuclear explosion to occur.
A hydrogen bomb (thermonuclear bomb) is more destructive than a regular nuclear bomb (fission bomb). Hydrogen bombs release much larger amounts of energy and have the potential to create significantly more devastation and damage.
alot
a nuclear one.
some
No, a bomb is not necessarily a nuclear reaction. A bomb can be any device that is designed to explode and cause destruction, whereas a nuclear reaction involves the splitting or combining of atomic nuclei to release energy. Nuclear bombs, also known as atomic bombs, utilize nuclear reactions to produce a very powerful explosion.
Nuclear bombs can be dangerous as during a atomic bomb explosions, it produces radiation. The effects of radiation could be that it can cause permanent damage to cells and can cause mutation. Along with this, it could cause severe burns to the skin.
The atom bomb is a type of nuclear weapon. Nuclear weapons can kill entire cities, make air quality unsafe, and kill plants and animals.
An atom bomb is a type of nuclear weapon that releases immense amounts of energy by splitting atoms through a process called nuclear fission. This results in a powerful explosion that can cause widespread destruction.
yes, you can use it in a sentence, for example:the apocalypse of nuclear war.
A nuclear bomb is a type of bomb that releases energy from splitting atoms (fission), whereas a plutonium bomb specifically uses plutonium as the primary fissile material to create the explosive chain reaction. Plutonium bombs are a subset of nuclear bombs.
Germany has not made a nuclear bomb.
The best nuclear bomb is the Tsar bomba
Robert Oppenheimer is the father of nuclear bomb.