No. The definition of acceleration is change in velocity.
Chat with our AI personalities
No, a body cannot move with a constant velocity in an accelerated motion. Accelerated motion implies a change in velocity over time, so the velocity of the body would not remain constant.
Yes, a body can be in motion but have zero acceleration if it is moving at a constant speed in a straight line. Acceleration measures the rate of change of velocity, so if velocity is constant, acceleration is zero even though the body is in motion.
No, constant speed implies that the body is moving at a consistent rate, while variable velocity means the direction of motion is changing. It is not possible for a body to have both constant speed and variable velocity simultaneously.
Uniformly accelerated motion describes an object moving with a constant acceleration. This means the object's velocity changes by the same amount in each time interval. The equations of motion for uniformly accelerated motion can be used to predict the object's position, velocity, and acceleration at any point in time.
No, balanced forces do not cause motion. Balanced forces result in an object remaining at rest or moving at a constant velocity. Motion only occurs when unbalanced forces act on an object.
When a body has uniform velocity, it is moving in a straight line at a constant speed. This means that the magnitude and direction of its velocity remain constant over time. uniform velocity implies no acceleration present in the motion of the body.