0
This passage is an example of inductive reasoning because it draws a general conclusion based on specific observations. By noting the actions of individual ants, it makes a broader claim about the behavior of ants as a group. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations from specific instances, which is evident in this passage.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is an example of of inductive reasoning?
What passage is an example of inductive reasoning? -Apex
What is the advantage of deductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning allows us to draw specific conclusions based on general principles or premises. It is a systematic approach that guarantees logical accuracy when the premises are true, providing a strong foundation for decision-making and problem-solving.
Why do we study logic?
We study logic to improve our critical thinking skills, analyze arguments for validity, and make sound decisions based on reasoning and evidence. Understanding logic helps us identify fallacies and inconsistencies in reasoning, leading to more rational and informed discussions and decisions.
Why is it important to be able to recognize logical fallacies?
Recognizing logical fallacies is important because it helps us identify flawed reasoning and argumentative tactics that can mislead or deceive us. By understanding fallacies, we can critically evaluate arguments, make better decisions, and engage in more effective and honest communication.
What is the aim of logic in philosophy?
The aim of logic in philosophy is to study and analyze reasoning and arguments in order to determine what makes an argument valid or sound. It helps us distinguish between good and bad reasoning, identify fallacies, and construct well-structured arguments. Ultimately, logic helps us arrive at more well-founded conclusions and make better decisions in our philosophical inquiries.
What type of reasoning involves us many specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations?
inductive reasoningThe type of reasoning that involves using specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations are called inductive reasons.
What is a conclusion reached through inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning goes from a general to a specific instance. For example, if we say all primes other than two are odd, deductive reasoning would let us say that 210000212343848212 is not prime. Here is a more "classic"example of deductive reasoning. All apples are fruits All fruits grow on trees Therefore, all apples grow on trees
What is an example of of inductive reasoning?
What passage is an example of inductive reasoning? -Apex
Examples of deductive logic?
This is a concept made more complex than necessary. The two complementary processes of inductive vs. deductive are very simply and easily understood. Consider the number series; 3, 5, 7, 'x', 11, 13, 15, 'y' Simple inspection shows this to be a series of 'odd' numbers, what a mathematician would call 'n+1'. Inductive vs. deductive simply describes the 'type' of reasoning used to determine either 'x' or 'y'. Because it lies 'inside' the other data points, the 'deduction' that 'x'=9 is reached by deductive logic, or, deductive reasoning. We 'deduce' x=9. 'y', on the other hand, lies 'outside' the data, i.e. we don't have a '19' on the 'right' of the 'y' to help us 'deduce' the answer. Much riskier than deductive logic/reasoning, we are forced to use less evidence than we did for the 'x' case. This method is called 'inductive logic/reasoning'. For those who've been exposed to just a little math, this process might seem similar to the dual processes of interpolation and extrapolation...that's because...they are. Identical. Smile, nod and thank those who try to convince you there's 'more to it than THAT!!!'. There isn't. 'Guessing' about anything from 'inside' the data = Deduction/Deductive Reasoning/Deductive Logic = fairly 'safe' procedure = (also) Interpolation. 'Guessing' about anything from 'outside' the data = Induction/Inductive Reasoning/Inductive Logic = slightly riskier procedure = (also) Extrapolation Example of Deductive Logic/Reasoning; Sign directly above two identical unmarked doors, saying 'Customer Restrooms'. Man exits 'left' door. Another man exits 'left' door. Person, with 'hoodie' up, leaves 'left' door. Fourth person, man, exits 'left' door. Deduction? Third person, of unknown gender, exiting 'left' door, was a man. Example of Inductive Logic/Reasoning (same scenario); 'Right' door is the 'ladies'. It really is just that simple.
What does logic do?
Helps us in reasoning factors.
What is an example of faulty cause and effect?
We've been in business for fifty years that makes us the bestansw2. As an example of false reasoning, I like "we all know that things get longer when they get warm, and that is why the days are longer in summer'
Which wide passage from the Atlantic to the Caribbean is guarded by US bases in Puerto Rico?
The Mona Passage
What can statistical reasoning help us to generalize correctly from?
A Sample to a Population
What notable thing did Obama do for us?
He quickly made us aware of his complete lack of reasoning ability!
Who was a bride paid by the US for safe passage?
If you mean mail order brides, the groom paid for her passage.
What literacy term is this reading passage an example of from Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen While Mary is adjusting her ideas he continued let us return to Mr Bingley?
This reading passage is an example of dialogue in "Pride and Prejudice" by Jane Austen. Dialogue is a literary term that refers to the conversation between characters in a story.
What is deduction and induction?
In logic, we often refer to the two broad methods of reasoning as the deductive and inductive approaches.Deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. Sometimes this is informally called a "top-down" approach. We might begin with thinking up a theoryabout our topic of interest. We then narrow that down into more specifichypotheses that we can test. We narrow down even further when we collect observations to address the hypotheses. This ultimately leads us to be able to test the hypotheses with specific data -- a confirmation (or not) of our original theories.Inductive reasoning works the other way, moving from specific observations to broader generalizations and theories. Informally, we sometimes call this a "bottom up" approach (please note that it's "bottom up" and not"bottoms up" which is the kind of thing the bartender says to customers when he's trying to close for the night!). In inductive reasoning, we begin with specific observations and measures, begin to detect patterns and regularities, formulate some tentative hypotheses that we can explore, and finally end up developing some general conclusions or theories.These two methods of reasoning have a very different "feel" to them when you're conducting research. Inductive reasoning, by its very nature, is more open-ended and exploratory, especially at the beginning. Deductive reasoning is more narrow in nature and is concerned with testing or confirming hypotheses. Even though a particular study may look like it's purely deductive (e.g., an experiment designed to test the hypothesized effects of some treatment on some outcome), most social research involves both inductive and deductive reasoning processes at some time in the project. In fact, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that we could assemble the two graphs above into a single circular one that continually cycles from theories down to observations and back up again to theories. Even in the most constrained experiment, the researchers may observe patterns in the data that lead them to develop new theories.
