Brutus is the one who argues that Marc Antony should not be killed along with Julius Caesar in Shakespeare's play "Julius Caesar." Brutus believes Antony would pose no threat without Caesar and suggests that sparing him will demonstrate their honorable intentions to the Roman people.
An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. This means that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. An argument is strong if the premises provide good support for the conclusion, making it likely to be true.
A valid argument becomes invalid when it contains a logical fallacy, such as a false premise or faulty reasoning. Additionally, if the conclusion does not necessarily follow from the premises provided, the argument is considered invalid.
A counterargument is an argument that presents a different viewpoint or challenges the original argument put forth. It aims to offer reasons why the initial argument may be flawed or incomplete, providing an alternative perspective for the reader or listener to consider.
One argument that opposes another could present evidence or reasoning that challenges the validity of the original points. It may offer a different perspective, counterexamples, or alternative interpretations to show flaws in the original argument. By presenting contrasting evidence or logic, the opposing argument aims to undermine the original position.
A valid deductive argument is one where the conclusion logically follows from the premises. In other words, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. The form of the argument must be such that it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false.
Mark Antony makes the speech of Julius' will. The will is not real, it was created by Antony himself.
Your question makes makes little sense. You do not state your subject of the argument.
An argument is inductive when it is based on probability, such as statistics. In an inductive argument, if the premises are true, the conclusion is probably true.
yogurt
Antony cant talk bad about Caesar, cant about the murders and the last rule i cant remember. Antony is very smart, he follows the rules and makes the speech emotional and tells everybody who killed Caesar BY FOLLOWING THE RULES! every body gets sad and mad and goes off to kill the murders.
it makes it weaker
That would be a moot point
In he play, I don't know, but in reality, Marc Antony was certainly no hero. In fact, he was one of history's biggest loosers.
A consensus.
An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. This means that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. An argument is strong if the premises provide good support for the conclusion, making it likely to be true.
Antony Gormley used techniques that are unlike any other, because he makes models of people he usually uses a cast in the shape of a body
The historian makes a counterclaim.