answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Conclusion indicators

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

2mo ago

These types of words are called conclusion indicators. They signal to the listener or reader that the argument is reaching a conclusion based on the presented premises. Examples of conclusion indicators include "thus," "therefore," and "so".

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: When these type of words are used in an argument they are indicator that the premises had been made and a conclusion will soon follow?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Is an argument valid or invalid?

An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is invalid if the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.


Can a deductively argument have false premises?

Yes, a deductive argument can have false premises. However, the conclusion does not follow logically if the premises are false, making the argument unsound.


If a deductive argument is valid and its premises are true?

If a deductive argument is valid and its premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This is because the structure of the argument guarantees that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must follow logically.


What is deductive argument?

A deductive argument is a logical reasoning process where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Deductive arguments are characterized by their validity, meaning that the conclusion cannot be false if the premises are true.


Can An argument can have suppressed or missing premises?

Yes, an argument can have suppressed or missing premises. An argument with suppressed premises does not explicitly state all the premises needed for the conclusion to logically follow, while an argument with missing premises does not include all the premises required for a valid argument. This can result in potential gaps or weaknesses in the reasoning presented.


What does a valid argument contain?

A valid argument contains a logical structure in which the premises logically lead to the conclusion. This means that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Additionally, the argument must follow the rules of logic, such as modus ponens or modus tollens.


Can an argument with a true premises and true conclusion be invalid?

Yes, an argument with true premises and a true conclusion can still be invalid if the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises. Invalidity concerns the structure of the argument rather than the truth of the statements involved.


When these types of words are used in an argument they are the indicator that a premise has been made and a conclusion will soon follow?

Conclusion indicators


Why cant you have an argument which is invalid and sound?

An argument that is invalid is one where the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises. A sound argument is one that is valid and has true premises. So, by definition, an argument cannot be both invalid and sound at the same time because for an argument to be sound it must be valid.


If deductive argument is invalid then?

If a deductive argument is invalid, it means that the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises. This indicates that the argument structure is flawed or that the premises do not support the conclusion in the intended manner. In such cases, the argument does not provide a sound basis for justifying the conclusion.


When the premise of a deductive argument follow the correct form we call the argument?

Valid. A deductive argument is considered valid when it follows the correct form of logic, even if the premises are not true. This means that if the premises of a valid deductive argument are true, then the conclusion must also be true.


What is a fallacy of syllogism Non sequitur personal attack division or argument from the negative?

A fallacy of syllogism occurs when a conclusion is drawn that does not logically follow from the premises. It is a form of flawed reasoning where the conclusion does not directly relate to the premises provided.