answersLogoWhite

0

If you dont pass this test you wont go to collage

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What statement contains an example of a logical fallacy?

"All politicians are dishonest because one politician was caught lying." This statement contains the logical fallacy of hasty generalization, as it draws a broad conclusion about all politicians based on the actions of just one individual.


What type of logical fallacy is this statement an example of?

Without knowing the specific statement, it is difficult to identify the type of logical fallacy. Can you please provide the statement so I can assist you further?


Which type of logical fallacy is this an example of?

It looks like you haven't provided an example of a logical fallacy. If you have one in mind, please share it so I can help identify which type of fallacy it belongs to.


Define Tautology and Fallacy?

A Tautology is any logical statement that always results in True. Example, the statement - "Malaria is dangerous" is always true.A Fallacy is a statement that always results in False. Example - "Toxic waste is easy to store" - is always falseThere are exactly opposite of each other.


This sentence contains an example of what type logical fallacy?

this man left his wife for another woman so we cant trust him


What type of logical fallacy is the statement Paul would make a great class president because he is good at basketball and example of?

The statement is an example of the logical fallacy known as "non sequitur," where the conclusion does not logically follow from the premise. Being good at basketball does not necessarily correlate with being a great class president, as the qualities needed for each role can be very different.


What is the fallacy of the inverse and how does it relate to logical reasoning?

The fallacy of the inverse occurs when someone assumes that if a statement is true, then its opposite must also be true. This is a logical error because just because a statement is true, it does not mean that its opposite is true as well. This fallacy is important in logical reasoning because it highlights the need to carefully evaluate each statement on its own merits, rather than assuming that its opposite must also be true.


The passage from “the damnation of a canyon” is an example of which logical fallacy?

Ad hominem


What type of logical fallacy is this statement an example of If you don't do your homework then you will fail the class and never get into college.?

This statement is an example of a false dichotomy fallacy, where only two options are presented (doing homework or failing the class and not getting into college), without considering other possible outcomes or choices that could lead to different consequences.


What type of logical fallacy is the following statement an example of Paul would make a great class president because he is good at basketball.sk us anything?

The statement is an example of a non-sequitur fallacy, where the conclusion does not logically follow from the premise. The fact that Paul is good at basketball does not necessarily mean he would make a great class president.


What kind of logical fallacy does this passage contain Crime is out of control in this city I've spoken to two people in the last six months who had their houses burglarized we need more police?

The passage contains the logical fallacy of hasty generalization. The conclusion that more police are needed to control crime is based on a small sample size (two people) and may not accurately represent the overall crime situation in the city. More data and analysis are needed to make a valid argument for increasing police presence.


Can you provide an example of a logical fallacy that involves contradictory premises?

An example of a logical fallacy that involves contradictory premises is the "fallacy of the excluded middle." This fallacy occurs when someone presents only two options as if they are the only possibilities, when in fact there are other options available. For example, saying "Either you're with us or you're against us" is a fallacy of the excluded middle because it ignores the possibility of being neutral or having a different perspective.