Euthyphro's dilemma is a philosophical question about the nature of morality and whether something is good because the gods command it, or whether the gods command it because it is good. This question was posed by Plato in his dialogue "Euthyphro" and continues to be a subject of debate in ethical theory.
In the dialog "Euthyphro," Socrates is questioning Euthyphro about the nature of piety and impiety. He wants Euthyphro to define what piety is and to provide a clear explanation of the difference between pious and impious actions. Socrates is ultimately searching for a universal definition of piety that is not based on personal opinions or beliefs.
Socrates wants to become Euthyphro's student because he admires Euthyphro's knowledge and expertise in matters of religion and ethics. Socrates hopes to learn from Euthyphro and engage in philosophical discussions to deepen his own understanding of morality and piety.
Euthyphro's first definition of piety as prosecuting wrongdoers, even if they are one's relatives, is problematic because it does not encompass all instances of piety. Piety involves more than just prosecuting wrongdoers; it also includes honoring the gods and fulfilling one's religious duties, which Euthyphro's definition fails to capture. Additionally, this definition is limited in scope and overlooks other important aspects of piety.
Euthyphro shifts his definition of piety from the former to the latter in Plato's dialogue because he realizes that the first definition is too broad and vague, and the second definition suggests a more specific understanding rooted in the gods' approval. By focusing on what the gods love, Euthyphro believes he can provide a more precise and acceptable definition of piety.
Socrates discusses the nature of piety or holiness in the dialogue Euthyphro. He questions Euthyphro about his understanding of piety and investigates whether actions are pious because the gods approve of them, or whether the gods approve of actions because they are pious.
Euthyphro was known to be one of Plato's dialogues (between Socrates and Euthyphro). Euthyphro was aparently a noted religious expert in the Classical Age of Greece. He and Socrates discussed the issue of piety - and what constituted piety - in this particular dialogue.
In the dialog "Euthyphro," Socrates is questioning Euthyphro about the nature of piety and impiety. He wants Euthyphro to define what piety is and to provide a clear explanation of the difference between pious and impious actions. Socrates is ultimately searching for a universal definition of piety that is not based on personal opinions or beliefs.
Socrates wants to become Euthyphro's student because he admires Euthyphro's knowledge and expertise in matters of religion and ethics. Socrates hopes to learn from Euthyphro and engage in philosophical discussions to deepen his own understanding of morality and piety.
The Euthyphro dilemma. "Are morally good acts willed by God because they are morally good, or are they morally good because they are willed by God?"
Euthyphro's first definition of piety as prosecuting wrongdoers, even if they are one's relatives, is problematic because it does not encompass all instances of piety. Piety involves more than just prosecuting wrongdoers; it also includes honoring the gods and fulfilling one's religious duties, which Euthyphro's definition fails to capture. Additionally, this definition is limited in scope and overlooks other important aspects of piety.
Euthyphro shifts his definition of piety from the former to the latter in Plato's dialogue because he realizes that the first definition is too broad and vague, and the second definition suggests a more specific understanding rooted in the gods' approval. By focusing on what the gods love, Euthyphro believes he can provide a more precise and acceptable definition of piety.
Socrates discusses the nature of piety or holiness in the dialogue Euthyphro. He questions Euthyphro about his understanding of piety and investigates whether actions are pious because the gods approve of them, or whether the gods approve of actions because they are pious.
Jacques Bailly has written: 'Plato's Euthyphro & Clitophon'
Socrates wants to become Euthyphro's student to gain a deeper understanding of piety. He believes that by studying under Euthyphro, he can learn more about the nature of holiness and develop his own philosophical arguments on the topic.
1. They both use examples as their first "definition" In Euthyphro Socrates asks "What is Piety?" and Euthyphro responds with "It is doing as I am doing now; that is to say prosecuting anyone who is guilty of murder, sacrilege, or of any similar crime..." In On Free Choice of the Will by Augustine, the question What is Evil? is asked and the first "definitions" are examples of Adultery, and Killing for war. 2. They both follow the form of Euthyphro's Dilemma. In Euthyphro the dilemma is "Is something pious because god loves it, or does god love it because it is pious?" In On Free Choice of the Will the Dilemma is "Is something evil because it is against the law, or is it against the law because it is evil?"
The main questions that govern the discussion between Socrates and Euthyphro pertain to the nature of piety or holiness. They inquire whether something is pious because the gods love it, or do the gods love something because it is pious.
No. Euthypro discusses piety and holiness of 'GOD' and describes good with Socrates.