An example of begging the question fallacy would be: "You can't prove that ghosts don't exist because there is no evidence that ghosts don't exist." This argument assumes its conclusion (that ghosts exist) by using the lack of evidence against it as evidence in favor of it.
Science cannot prove the existence of something that does not exist, as its methods rely on observable evidence and testing hypotheses. If something does not have any physical manifestation or empirical data to support its existence, science cannot provide proof of it.
Claiming that aliens must exist because there is no evidence to prove they don't. Arguing that a conspiracy theory is valid because there is no way to disprove it. Believing in the effectiveness of a certain treatment because there is no proof that it doesn't work.
I believe your question is; "Do GHOSTS exist?" That is debatable. I have not seen any ghosts, but i believe in the possibility that they exist. And there are videos of unexplained phenomena that support my claim. Although I think most of the visible ones are fake. One theory: Ghosts are those who have unfinished business on earth, or are rejected by both heaven (not good enough) and hell (not bad enough)
To strengthen or prove your argument, you can add relevant evidence, data, expert opinions, examples, counterarguments and rebuttals, and logical reasoning. It is important to use credible sources and ensure that your points are clear and cohesive to support your argument effectively.
We do not need evidence that gods do not exist. We don't need to prove a negative. The claim there is no proof that gods do not exist is part of a fallacious argument used by some believers to balance out the lack of any evidence that gods doexist. Try not to get confused about that issue.Regarding the issue of evidence of the existence of God, please see the related question.
You cant prove anything if you first think you need to SEE TO BELIEVE You need to BELIEVE TO SEE that's how you get evidence I have tried it have seen the Glory of Jesus Christ
The fossils that are currently stored in museums.
i believe that the kracken really does exist, but we have no real evidence to prove that theory.....
a person would have to see it with their own eyes... technology has gotten to advanced to be able to prove it with visual evidence unless you experience it yourself
You need evidence to prove any charge.
You cannot prove that something doesn't exist. You can only prove that things do exist. It is called the paradox of negative information. You can fail to prove the existence of things and many people would take this as proof of non-existence, but it just isn't so.
Simple answer is there is NONE. No believable or good quality evidence has been produced to prove that Nessy does or does not exist.
Frankly no. No one can prove a thing does not exist. But, it can be proven, especially in the case of the Illuminati, that while they did exist at one time, they were driven into extinction.
Not that any of us know of, but just because theres no evidence, does not prove them to not be real. On the other hand... They could,some people belive in this.
There is little evidence to prove that ghost exist. However, there is little evidence to prove they don't exist. On one hand, if they never existed in the past then they never will. On the other hand, if they once existed then they will always exist because, it is said that there are spirits inside living bodies and these spirits turn into ghost if the person did bad; there are plenty of bad people in the world so there probaly still are ghost if what they said is true.
No. Evidence is only presented if the prosecutor and defender need to argue the case. The evidence is only used to prove guilt or innocence.