answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Premise 1: Every person is entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Premise 2: England has infringed the colonists' right to life, liberty, and happiness.

Conclusion: Therefore colonists have a right to independence.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

6mo ago

Jefferson's argument in the Declaration of Independence is based on the premises that all individuals are endowed with certain unalienable rights, that governments derive their powers from the consent of the governed, and that people have the right to alter or abolish a government that violates their rights.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are the premises of Jefferson's argument?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Can An argument can have suppressed or missing premises?

Yes, an argument can have suppressed or missing premises. An argument with suppressed premises does not explicitly state all the premises needed for the conclusion to logically follow, while an argument with missing premises does not include all the premises required for a valid argument. This can result in potential gaps or weaknesses in the reasoning presented.


Can a deductively argument have false premises?

Yes, a deductive argument can have false premises. However, the conclusion does not follow logically if the premises are false, making the argument unsound.


If a deductive argument is valid and its premises are true?

If a deductive argument is valid and its premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This is because the structure of the argument guarantees that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must follow logically.


How can you tell if an argument is sound?

An argument is sound if it is valid (the conclusion logically follows from the premises) and all the premises are true. To determine if an argument is sound, you need to assess both its logical structure (validity) and the truth of its premises.


Is an argument valid or invalid?

An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is invalid if the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.


What is the difference between valid and sound in a argument?

In logic, a valid argument is one where the conclusion logically follows from the premises. A sound argument is a valid argument with true premises. So, a sound argument is not only valid, but it also has true premises, making it both logically correct and factually accurate.


How can you tell if an argument is valid?

An argument is valid if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. In a valid argument, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This can be determined by evaluating the logical structure of the argument.


A deductive argument with two premises is a?

A deductive argument with two premises is a syllogism in logic. It consists of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion that follows logically from the premises.


What is the premises of an argument?

The premises of an argument are the statements or evidence put forward to support the conclusion. They are the basic building blocks upon which the argument is constructed.


What word is used to classify an argument if it is valid and all of its premises are true?

The word used to classify an argument if it is valid and all of its premises are true is "sound." A sound argument is when the logical structure of the argument is valid and all the premises are true, leading to a logically sound conclusion.


All valid arguments are sound arguments?

This statement is not correct. A valid argument is one in which the conclusion logically follows from the premises, regardless of whether the premises are true or not. A sound argument, on the other hand, is a valid argument with true premises. So, while all sound arguments are valid, not all valid arguments are sound.


What is an invalid argument?

In invalid argument is one in which the premises do not necessitate the truth of the conclusion. An argument's validity or invalidity does NOT depend on the actual truth of the premises, just what they would entail IF they are true.