0
Brutus and Cassius considered rule by the peoples' representatives in the Senate in Roman Democracy far advisable than rule by an Emperor. After his magnificent diplomacy in Greece and after his many unequalled victories on his way back after his Egyptian tour, the Senate had already conferred on Caesar the authority of Dictator. Though he was a very wise and judicious man, Caesar was not tactful enough not to hint and suggest his nomination and appointment by the Senate as the Emperor of All Roman Lands. It was in that fateful Senate meeting that he was stabbed by his trustful friend Brutus. But Brutus soon learned that real democracy in Rome was a mirage, skillfully created by the treachery and greed of Octavian, a crown-seeker. So the disiilusioned he got himself killed by Cassius. The somewhat repentant Cassius also took his own life. History says that even if he had been appointed by the Senate as Emperor, Caesar would only have ruled the Roman lands justfully. His diplomatic and military strategy in enthroning Cleopatra in Egypt proves his statesmanship. None other in his times in Rome could rise to his political and administrative calibre. Therefore his killing in the Roman Senate was unnecessary and hence Brutus and Cassius ensured preservation of no political value. History existed in the recorded form far earlier than Shakespeare and don't count on him for learning the true facts of the ancient Roman lfe. He altered not the lives of famous characters in history but their attitudes, to attain stage success. His dramas were prepared not to be read as literary creations but to be acted on stage for a living even though he loathed doing it.
The main political value that Brutus and Cassius share is their belief in the principles of republicanism and their dedication to preserving the Roman Republic. They both fear the rise of a tyrant and are committed to promoting the ideals of democracy and the rule of law. Additionally, they both prioritize the welfare of Rome and its citizens above personal gain or ambition.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What beliefs do US and France have in common?
The US and France share beliefs in democracy, human rights, and freedom of expression. Both countries value individual liberties and equality under the law. Additionally, they both promote secularism and the separation of religion and state.
Why did the idea of slavery being wrong come from religious and political reformers?
Religious and political reformers challenged the idea of slavery based on moral principles that emphasized the equality and value of all human beings. They saw slavery as a violation of these beliefs and worked to promote social justice and human rights. These reformers believed that slavery was incompatible with their vision of a just society grounded in ethical values.
Would Socrates Plato Aristotle and Aquinas concur that all moral and political truth is relative to ones time and place?
Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and Aquinas would likely disagree that all moral and political truth is relative to one's time and place. They believed in objective standards of morality and sought to uncover universal truths that are applicable across different contexts and time periods. They emphasized the importance of reason and virtue in determining moral and political principles.
What was the results of enlightenment on people?
The Enlightenment led to an increase in critical thinking, scientific discovery, and political reform. It encouraged people to question traditional authority and seek knowledge through reason and evidence. Ultimately, it laid the foundation for many of the democratic principles and human rights that we value today.
Do the Filipinos of today really value the freedom than your heroes fought for?
Yes, many Filipinos today value the freedom that past heroes fought for. This can be seen in how they participate in social and political causes, express their opinions freely, and honor the sacrifices made by previous generations to secure this freedom. However, there are also challenges and complexities in fully realizing and maintaining this freedom in modern times.
The main value that Brutus and Cassius share is?
They think that Caesar is getting too powerful.
What does Shakespeare say about humanity through Cassius in the play Julius Caesar?
This is a very broad question, but I will give my take on it. One aspect of Cassius is his machiavellian plotting, driven by jealousy and hatred of Caesar. This interpretation would suggest that Shakespeare is using the character of Cassius to comment on this dangerous aspect of human nature. There are, however, several more complex layers to this character. Ironically, it is Cassius, not the noble Brutus, who seems to truly value human relationships. It seems that Cassius surrenders to Brutus' weaker judgments regarding the conspiracy because he values their friendship so deeply. It can be argued that his hatred for Caesar and his love of Brutus are the two most powerful forces driving Cassius throughout the play. This interpretation would suggest that Shakespeare is also using Cassius to comment on the manner in which personal relationships compel people to take extreme actions. Shakespeare may also be using Cassius as a means to comment on the nature of political reform. Shakespeare extensively read Machiavelli, and Cassius' character seems to reflect Machiavelli's theory that certain individuals carry the desire to dominate and subjugate the people and are kept in check only by others with similar ambition. This raises an important question about humanity. Is tyranny kept at bay only by jealousy? Cassius also plays a vital role in Shakespeare's discussion of the human view of fate and destiny. He is the character who utters the famous lines "the fault, dear Brutus, lies not in our stars but in ourselves that we are underlings." Cassius wants to believe that he has control over his own destiny, so much so that he embraces suicide as a noble means of freeing oneself from gnoble circumstances. It seems that Shakespeare is using Cassius to comment on the tendency for humans to feel that they are "masters of their fates." I hope this helps.
What is the value of a Cassius clay Autograph?
102.50 on a napkin
What is the face value of the share?
Share can have mutliple values at a time. Face value of share is the value written on share document while market value of share is the value at which share is currently selling in capital market. For Example: when a new share issued by company value on share is $10 which is face value. After one year of issue of share, share is selling in market at $12 which is it's market value.
Face value of a share?
Face value of share is the amount mentioned at face of share which is the basic value at which share is normally issued if issued at par value.
What is share value of Bank of Baroda share today?
please update the share value
Why the share value increases?
when market value increase than share value increase
How can the price of a company's share be less than the face value of the share?
How can the price of a company's share be less than the face value of the share?" How can the price of a company's share be less than the face value of the share?"
What is dividend on share?
increase value of share
What is share discount?
Share discount refers to the amount by which a given market value of a share drops below its par value.
What is par value per share?
If a share costs 95 pence to buy, then that is its par value.
What is meant by face value of a share?
The value of the share of stock as it is actually printed on the face of the certificate.
