Being genuine and being honest are closely related but not necessarily the same. Genuine typically refers to being authentic, sincere, and true to oneself, while being honest specifically pertains to telling the truth and not being deceptive. Someone can be genuine without always being honest, and vice versa.
No, a point and a topic are not the same thing. A point is a specific aspect or idea within a discussion, argument, or presentation, while a topic is the subject or theme that is being discussed or written about. You can have multiple points related to a single topic.
'Being qua being' is a concept from Aristotelian philosophy that refers to the study of existence itself, as distinct from studying specific things that exist. It focuses on understanding the fundamental nature of being and existence, rather than the characteristics of individual entities.
No, being optimistic means having a positive outlook and expecting good outcomes, while being open-minded means being receptive to new ideas, perspectives, and experiences without bias or judgment. It is possible to be optimistic without being open-minded, and vice versa.
Yes, "cheapskate" and "stingy" both refer to a person who is unwilling to spend money. They both carry a negative connotation of being overly frugal or unwilling to be generous.
state of being mean the same thing as the subject and follow a verb of being
Basically the same as the supreme being of the Christians and Muslims. Bahá'ís simply talk about "God", appropriately translated into different languages.
Allah (or God in English); same God in Christianity and Judaism.
Yes.
No. They're not even closely related to being the same thing.
Yes, being thrify and being frugal are generally the same thing. They mean spending wisely, carefully, economically; not being wasteful with money or resources.
Agnostics are in the middle. They see no proof in their being a supreme being and no proof that their isn't a supreme being.
They mean the same thing.
yes the supreme council of the union is same as the federal supreme council...
No. As not all insane people are pyromaniacs, it follows that being insane and being a pyromaniac can not be the same thing (even if you assert that all pyromaniacs are by definition insane).
Civil war in ancient Rome was the same thing as civil war anyplace else. It was an armed internal struggle between two (or more) factions each vieing for supreme power.Civil war in ancient Rome was the same thing as civil war anyplace else. It was an armed internal struggle between two (or more) factions each vieing for supreme power.Civil war in ancient Rome was the same thing as civil war anyplace else. It was an armed internal struggle between two (or more) factions each vieing for supreme power.Civil war in ancient Rome was the same thing as civil war anyplace else. It was an armed internal struggle between two (or more) factions each vieing for supreme power.Civil war in ancient Rome was the same thing as civil war anyplace else. It was an armed internal struggle between two (or more) factions each vieing for supreme power.Civil war in ancient Rome was the same thing as civil war anyplace else. It was an armed internal struggle between two (or more) factions each vieing for supreme power.Civil war in ancient Rome was the same thing as civil war anyplace else. It was an armed internal struggle between two (or more) factions each vieing for supreme power.Civil war in ancient Rome was the same thing as civil war anyplace else. It was an armed internal struggle between two (or more) factions each vieing for supreme power.Civil war in ancient Rome was the same thing as civil war anyplace else. It was an armed internal struggle between two (or more) factions each vieing for supreme power.
The followers of christianity calltheir supreme being God.