answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

A hypothesis only becomes a valid argument after it has been proved.

It is only a valid argument if there is proof (i.e. from an experiment).

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

6mo ago

tested and supported by evidence gathered through research or experimentation. This process helps to verify the hypothesis' accuracy and reliability in making predictions about the phenomenon being studied. Without testing and evidence, a hypothesis remains a proposed explanation without the weight of scientific validation.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

tested

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Hypothesis only becomes a valid argument conclusion after it has been?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

A hypothesis only becomes a valid argument conclusion after it has been?

C. testedtested and proven to be true.


Can a valid deductive argument have a false conclusion?

No, a valid deductive argument cannot have a false conclusion. If the argument is valid, it means that the conclusion logically follows from the premises. If the conclusion is false, it means that the argument is not valid.


A valid argument can have a false conclusion True or False?

True. A valid argument can have a false conclusion if the premises logically lead to that conclusion even though it is not true. Validity in logic refers to the structure of the argument, regardless of the truth or falsity of the premises or conclusion.


How can you tell if an argument is valid?

An argument is valid if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. In a valid argument, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This can be determined by evaluating the logical structure of the argument.


What makes a valid argument invalid?

A valid argument becomes invalid when it contains a logical fallacy, such as a false premise or faulty reasoning. Additionally, if the conclusion does not necessarily follow from the premises provided, the argument is considered invalid.


Is an argument valid or invalid?

An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is invalid if the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.


What is the difference between a valid deductive argument and a fallacy?

A valid deductive argument will have a valid premise and conclusion and a fallacy may be true, it all matters on how you came to the conclusion.


Can a sound argument have a false conclusion?

A sound argument cannot have a false conclusion. A sound argument refers to a deductive argument which is valid and has all true premises, therefore its conclusion cannot be false.


What is the difference between valid and sound in a argument?

In logic, a valid argument is one where the conclusion logically follows from the premises. A sound argument is a valid argument with true premises. So, a sound argument is not only valid, but it also has true premises, making it both logically correct and factually accurate.


What is deductively valid argument?

A deductively valid argument is if the premises are true then the conclusion is certainly true, not possibly true. The definition does not say that the conclusion is true.


An argument which demonstrates or proves the conclusion is said to be?

Valid


What steps are involved in making a valid conclusion?

Scientists use the data from an experiment to evaluate the hypothesis and draw a valid conclusion.