Scientific questions typically seek answers through empirical observation and experimentation, aiming to explain natural phenomena based on evidence. Philosophical questions, on the other hand, often explore concepts beyond empirical verification, such as the nature of existence, ethics, or consciousness, relying more on reasoning and logic for analysis and discussion.
There is no difference between "solipsism" and "solipcism"; they are likely just spelling errors of the same term, which refers to the philosophical idea that only one's mind is sure to exist or the view that the self is all that can be known to exist.
Philosophical analysis is the critical examination of ideas and concepts to uncover their underlying assumptions, implications, and logical coherence. It aims to clarify the meaning of concepts, resolve disagreements, and provide a deeper understanding of complex issues.
Philosophers bridge the gap between science and philosophy by studying the nature of scientific inquiry, exploring the implications of scientific findings for philosophical issues, and examining the philosophical assumptions that underlie scientific practices. They aim to create a dialogue between the two disciplines, seeking areas of convergence and mutual enrichment.
"-ology" refers to the study of a particular subject or field, such as biology or psychology, while "-osophy" typically refers to a system of beliefs or principles related to a certain topic, like philosophy or theology. "-ology" is more focused on the scientific study and analysis of a subject, while "-osophy" is often associated with the philosophical or theoretical aspects of a topic.
Philosophical jurisprudence is the branch of philosophy that examines the nature of law, legal systems, and the role of law in society. It focuses on questions about the foundation, legitimacy, and interpretation of laws, as well as the relationship between law and ethics or justice. Philosophical jurisprudence seeks to understand the underlying principles and theories that shape legal systems and decision-making.
relationship between scientific and philosophical method of investigation
science questions are abot the nature , chemstry and snd someother questions that make sence.
questions about (a) the meaning of the concepts and(b) the relationship between them
Between Scientific Theory and what?
what is the difference between the common and scientific name of an organisms
Scientific questions are based on observable evidence and can be tested through research and experimentation, leading to objective conclusions. Nonscientific questions are often subjective, speculative, or based on personal beliefs, and do not follow the systematic methods of the scientific process.
what is the difference between the common and scientific name of an organisms
difference between scientific management practices and modern management practices.?
Involves science and experiment sometimes, while other's are boring or "make-no-sense" questions
I am not sure sorry.
A scientific hypothesis has to be testable.
there are two difference, they have the same observation and the same hypotheisse