0
Heteronomous morality is when a person follows rules or moral principles set by an external authority, such as parents or society, without questioning or understanding the reasons behind them. An example of this could be a teenager obeying a curfew set by their parents without understanding the importance of safety or respecting their parents' wishes.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Steve
Rafa
BeauAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Can you provide examples of master morality in action?
Master morality, as defined by Friedrich Nietzsche, is a moral code that values strength, power, and individualism. Examples of master morality in action can be seen in historical figures like Alexander the Great, who conquered vast territories through his military prowess and ambition. Another example is Steve Jobs, who revolutionized the technology industry with his innovative ideas and determination to succeed. These individuals exemplify the principles of master morality by asserting their dominance and achieving greatness through their own abilities and willpower.
Can you provide an example of a moral action that you have taken in the past?
One example of a moral action I have taken in the past is standing up for a classmate who was being bullied.
Can you provide an example of feminist ethics in action?
An example of feminist ethics in action is advocating for equal pay for women in the workplace to ensure fair treatment and opportunities for all genders.
What criteria determine the morality of a particular action or decision?
The morality of an action or decision is determined by considering factors such as the intention behind the action, the consequences it may have on others, whether it respects the rights and well-being of others, and whether it aligns with ethical principles or values.
Can law and morality diverge?
Yes, law and morality can diverge. While laws are created and enforced by governing bodies, morality is based on personal beliefs and principles. There are times when an action may be legally permissible but morally questionable, or vice versa.
