Is he? What is a "noble gentleman"? He is certainly arrogant and holds the people of Denmark in contempt, as witness:
1. "the groundlings, who for the most part are capable of nothing but inexplicable dumb-shows and noise" Read: poor people are stupid.
2. "he's for a jig or a tale of bawdry, or he sleeps" Read: Polonius is a lowbrow; ignore him.
3. "the age is grown so picked that the toe of the peasant comes so near the heel of the courtier he galls his kibe" Read: What! Do these peasants consider themselves even close to being our equals?
4. His whole treatment of Osric. "Let a beast be lord of beasts and his crib shall stand at the king's mess." Read: Just because Osric owns land, don't think he isn't another stupid peasant.
5. His callous murder of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. "They are not near my conscience; their defeat does by their own insinuation grow." Read: Sure, I'll kill the messenger. He deserves it for being a messenger.
An aristocratic gentleman, surely, but noble? Not in my books.
Hamlet's first line in Shakespeare's Hamlet. It is said in response to Claudius's line "And now my cousin Hamlet, and our son . . ." Hamlet is both nephew and stepson to Claudius, which is more kinship than is usual. "Less than kind" might mean that Claudius is not a kind person, with the sound pun on the words "kin" and "kind" The line might also mean that Hamlet is kin to Claudius (indeed, more than kin), but he is not of Claudius's kind--they are unlike.
Shakespeare was not known for his ideas. He was known for his plays, which were indeed immediately popular.
The words "to be or not to be" or even the speech that starts with those words is so well-known and famous that people tend to forget that it exists only because it is a speech said by a character called Hamlet in a play called Hamlet. Shakespeare put those words in Hamlet's mouth for a purpose related to the flow of the dramatic action. The problem is that the speech does not seem to have much to do with the dramatic action at that point of the play, or indeed with the action of the play at all. It has no reference to any of the characters in the play, or any of the situations in the play. It does not include the pronouns "I" or "me" so it is hard to believe that Hamlet is talking about himself. For some reason, Hamlet is indulging in an impersonal philosophical discourse while going to an appointment with Claudius (Claudius does say earlier in the scene that he has sent for Hamlet). It is up to the director and actor to find a reason which satisfies them.
Autumn
People who expect the monarchy to pass by primogeniture (as the English monarchy does and did in Shakespeare's day) would expect Prince Hamlet to have been the heir to King Hamlet. Thus it is ironic for Claudius to say that Hamlet is most immediate to Claudius's throne because by the rules of primogeniture, Claudius has usurped and Claudius should be the most immediate to Hamlet's throne. There is a further irony in that in fact in Denmark at the time, the rules of primogeniture did not apply and Claudius would indeed have been the rightful heir, especially having married the widow of the previous king, but the audience, thinking they know better, would consider him to be a usurper.
As the soliloquy at that point is indeed speaking about death (Hamlet is contemplating suicide) it suggests that he is talking about the afterlife - from which no one has ever returned - except of course Jesus Christ. (Allegedly mind you...)
No. Most of the characters in the play have speaking parts, although there are Lords, guardsmen and others mentioned in the stage directions who do not speak. However, as part of the play-within-a-play, Shakespeare wrote a prologue to the play called a "dumb-show" which is in fact a "silent play"--the actors do not speak. So in that sense a part of Hamlet is indeed a silent play.
Hamlet's first line in Shakespeare's Hamlet. It is said in response to Claudius's line "And now my cousin Hamlet, and our son . . ." Hamlet is both nephew and stepson to Claudius, which is more kinship than is usual. "Less than kind" might mean that Claudius is not a kind person, with the sound pun on the words "kin" and "kind" The line might also mean that Hamlet is kin to Claudius (indeed, more than kin), but he is not of Claudius's kind--they are unlike.
Hamlet says, "But, indeed, if you find him not within this month, you shall nose him as you go up the stairs into the lobby."
Shakespeare was not known for his ideas. He was known for his plays, which were indeed immediately popular.
The words "to be or not to be" or even the speech that starts with those words is so well-known and famous that people tend to forget that it exists only because it is a speech said by a character called Hamlet in a play called Hamlet. Shakespeare put those words in Hamlet's mouth for a purpose related to the flow of the dramatic action. The problem is that the speech does not seem to have much to do with the dramatic action at that point of the play, or indeed with the action of the play at all. It has no reference to any of the characters in the play, or any of the situations in the play. It does not include the pronouns "I" or "me" so it is hard to believe that Hamlet is talking about himself. For some reason, Hamlet is indulging in an impersonal philosophical discourse while going to an appointment with Claudius (Claudius does say earlier in the scene that he has sent for Hamlet). It is up to the director and actor to find a reason which satisfies them.
Autumn
People who expect the monarchy to pass by primogeniture (as the English monarchy does and did in Shakespeare's day) would expect Prince Hamlet to have been the heir to King Hamlet. Thus it is ironic for Claudius to say that Hamlet is most immediate to Claudius's throne because by the rules of primogeniture, Claudius has usurped and Claudius should be the most immediate to Hamlet's throne. There is a further irony in that in fact in Denmark at the time, the rules of primogeniture did not apply and Claudius would indeed have been the rightful heir, especially having married the widow of the previous king, but the audience, thinking they know better, would consider him to be a usurper.
Shakespeare had only the one son, Hamnet, who was indeed the twin brother of Judith.
Yes, indeed there was, as well as Bear/bull baiting :)
Anywhere where they sell books. It would be a very poor bookstore indeed that did not carry the works of Shakespeare somewhere.
He did indeed. It's the most famous thing he says. He says it in Act III Scene 1 of the play.