Deer hunting in an area where predators have been extirpated, man needs to hunt certain animals in order to prevent overpopulation. For example, in Illinois the cougar and the wolf have been gone for well over a century and as a result, the deer population has exploded. The state department of Natural Resources has taken measures to counter this by allowing hunting. Man is the only predator left. If the natural predators had not been removed by man, then this would not be necessary. Furthermore:There also exists the problem of human-wildlife interaction. The above example of Illinois is a great one. Since the predators have been missing for so long, humankind has felt free to expand all over the place. Something that is a natural occurrence in all of the reals of bio geography is that the predators and prey will always rise and fall in their populations, no matter the initial reasons. So humans have lowered the cougar (AKA mountain lion, puma, panther, the name varies by location.) population to the point where the deer population is allowed to explode. Not only do the deer eventually begin to encroach upon human-claimed territory (If that is the way you like to think of it.), but eventually the cougars will return too. This could be tragic, although it is highly unlikely that a human would ever even see a cougar in a residential area (They are very good at not being seen.) much less attacked by one. Still, if you look into population growth, the cougars are returning as the deer population drops (As is the natural result of the rising predator population, the cougars will drop accordingly. But still, there is plenty of food for them to eat.)
Hunting helps halt this by putting a cap on the amount of food there is for a predator. With fewer deer to feed the cougar population, the bloom will not last as long, and the cougars will again retreat to the west where there is more room for them.
Still, it will be interesting to see the amount of human fear involved with the rising cougar population. (Sightings will increase, and of course there is a level of danger attached.) We can only hope that the reaction will not be as horrible as it was when we first domesticated this land. We should be careful not to exterminate them, as we tend to do when we are afraid.
Keeps the animal population down, which allows for the growth of plants and other animal species
I agree with all of the above, but keep in mind that those reasons are to keep the environment in a state that we humans enjoy. Without hunting, there would be a major shift in habitat due to over grazing etc., but the environment would continue. Hunting isn't essential to the environment, it's essential to keep the environment the way we want it.
The Production Budget for Good Will Hunting was $10,000,000.
Good Will Hunting was released on 12/05/1997.
No
Don't look behind you, because you are about to find out that he is good and hunting good.
Good Will Hunting was created on 1997-12-05.
Good Will Hunting was released on 12/05/1997.
Good will hunting was written by Matt Damon and Ben Affleck
Yes, definitely hunting do hurt environment ascreate imbalance in natural environmentbrought many species in dangerdevelop sense of brutality in environmenthunter became rigid in their routine behavior
Lionblaze is good at hunting, but he is better at fighting. He is better at fighting because of his powers.
"Good 'Quil Hunting".
Good Will Hunting grossed $138,433,435 in the domestic market.
hunting and gathering