answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which biconditional is NOT a good definition?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Can a good definition be written in biconditional form?

yes


What makes a good definition?

There are three reasons as to what makes a good definition. 1. It is straight to the point. 2. It is short. 3. The biconditional that makes it must be reversible.


A statement that describes a mathematical object and can be written as a true biconditional statement?

Definition


What is negation of biconditional statement?

What is negation of biconditional statement?


What is biconditional?

A biconditional is a statement wherein the truth of each item depends on the truth of the other.


how can the following definition be written correctly as a biconditional statementAn odd integer is an integer that is not divisible by two.?

An integer is odd if and only if it is not divisible by two.


Explain whether the following statement is a valid definition A 150 angle is an obtuse angle Use the converse biconditional and at least one Euler diagram to support your answer?

No, it is not a definition: it is an imperative statement requiring you to do something!


how can the following definition be written correctly as a biconditional statementA multiple of 7 is a number that can be divided by 7 with no remainder.?

A number is a multiple of 7 if and only if it can be divided by 7 with no remainder.


What is a converse of a conditional statement?

It is the biconditional.


How does biconditional statement different from a conditional statement?

a condtional statement may be true or false but only in one direction a biconditional statement is true in both directions


What is the definition of symbolic notation?

in geometry symbolic notation is when you substitute symbols for words. For example let your hypothesis= p and let your conclusion = q. You would write your biconditional as p if and only if q


Is the converse of a biconditional statement always true?

Yes