How reliable is black adder as a source of information about the ww1 trenches?
is reputation an effecive indicator of a person's being a reliable source of information
Everybody knows, the most reliable source of information if the AnswersWiki of Answers.com. Or reading from goats intestines ...
No, wixpedia.com is not a reliable source of information. It is not a well-known or established site for accurate and trustworthy information. It is always best to verify information from reputable sources.
The internet is not the most reliable but sometimes the only source, as some information can only be found there.
Information that you can trust would be termed reliable. If you aren't sure of the source, or the source is someone that you don't trust, then the information would be unreliable, and you wouldn't count on it in an important situation. If the information is reliable, then you might trust it without doing your own research.
For a slew of reliable information about polar bears, see Answers.com via the Related link.
Unfortunately, you haven't provided a list to follow. There is not enough information to base off of to figure out which is a reliable source. You will have to post another question with more information.
Wikipedia has been shown to be a reliable source of information that is constantly up to date and where it is possible to bring corrections to articles where needed. I think you can rely on the information there.
Very much so. It is an officialy recognized database by professionals.
textbook apexC: V.H.<3
They do find reliable sources. Without that their work is invalid and wrong.