0
Would you expect there to be more producers or more consumers in an ecosystem why?
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which organisms in this ecosystem would you expect to have the lowest population?
Tertiary consumers receive the least amount of energy from producers.
In a ecosystem which would have a larger population producers or primary consumers?
Producers since they make up the population. Yes, they will be threatened by the primary consumers, But since there main goal is to produce, not consume.
What would happen if there were no secondary consumers?
Without secondary consumers, primary consumers would likely experience an increase in population, leading to overgrazing or overconsumption of primary producers. This could disrupt the entire food chain and ecosystem balance, ultimately affecting the biodiversity and stability of the ecosystem.
Why are producers important in an ecosystem?
Producers are important in an ecosystem because they are the organisms that can convert energy from the sun into food through photosynthesis. They form the base of the food chain, providing energy for all other organisms in the ecosystem. Without producers, there would be no energy input into the system, leading to a collapse of the entire ecosystem.
Why must an ecosystem have more producers than consumers?
When the producer is eaten by the consumer, it is an exchange of energy. Ironically, 90% of the energy that the producer had is lost, and the consumer only receives 10% of it. Therefore, to get enough energy to survive, the consumer must eat more producers, meaning that, to sustain the consumers, there must me many more producers.
Which organisms in this ecosystem would you expect to have the lowest population?
Tertiary consumers receive the least amount of energy from producers.
A stable pond ecosystem would not contain?
A stable pond ecosystem would not contain excessive nutrient runoff from surrounding agricultural fields, as it can lead to eutrophication and disrupt the balance of the ecosystem.
Why would there be less consumers than producers in a pond ecosystem?
Becuase the comsumers would starve if there were more of them then producers
What effect would the loss of a producer have on the ecosystem?
A loss of a producer means that there will be less food for consumers since producers are the foundation of an ecosystem
In a ecosystem which would have a larger population producers or primary consumers?
Producers since they make up the population. Yes, they will be threatened by the primary consumers, But since there main goal is to produce, not consume.
Does producers are the source of all the food in an ecosystem?
Yes and no, without them there would be no life because primary consumers would die without food, and then secondary consumers and so forth. However secondary consumers don't feed directly from the producers so they are not all the food in that sense.
What are the producers and consumers in the movie of the Lion King?
Producers in The Lion King as in an ecosystem would be the sun and the grass, and consumers would be the lions, hyenas, meerkats, and warthogs.
What would happen if there were no secondary consumers?
Without secondary consumers, primary consumers would likely experience an increase in population, leading to overgrazing or overconsumption of primary producers. This could disrupt the entire food chain and ecosystem balance, ultimately affecting the biodiversity and stability of the ecosystem.
Is it possible for an ecosystem to survive with out producers?
think of yourself you moron! your so stupid you don't know the answer? it's easy if there's no producers there will be no consumers if there is no consumers no producers ... let's put it this way, producers need consumers to expand and grow there population and there way of living even if it's a plant at least it is a living organism and consumers need producers to give of something for their waste so it's impossible that producers would be lost! it's a cycle remember!
Why are producers important to consumers?
Without producers, consumers would not exist.
What would the primary producers in a grassland ecosystem most likely be?
In this ecosystem, the producer is the grass. Producer make their own food and include plants, grass, and algae. Consumers are animals that do not make food but must feed on other consumers.
Why are producers important for the transfer of energy within an ecosystem?
Producers are important for the transfer of energy within an ecosystem because they are capable of converting sunlight into chemical energy through photosynthesis. This energy is then passed on to consumers within the ecosystem through the consumption of the producers. Without producers, there would be no initial energy source for the rest of the ecosystem.
