Net present value (NPV) is superior to accounting rate of return (ARR) and payback period (PB) because it takes into account the time value of money by discounting future cash flows back to the present. ARR does not consider the time value of money and only focuses on accounting profits. PB only considers the time it takes to recoup the initial investment without considering the profitability of the investment over its entire lifespan.
Yes, NPVs would change if the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) changed. A higher WACC would result in a lower NPV, while a lower WACC would result in a higher NPV. This is because the discount rate used in calculating NPV is based on the WACC.
Pb=Lead
lead Latin name plumbum shortened to Pb
There are 1,024 terabytes (TB) in a petabyte (PB).
In chemistry, chemical symbols are written with the first letter capitalized and subsequent letters in lowercase. This convention helps to clearly distinguish between elements. Therefore, the correct chemical symbol for lead is Pb, not PB.
Why is the NPV approach often regarded to be superior to the IRR method?
How is the method superior to the payback method
How is the method superior to the payback method
two traditional methods: Average rate of return (ARR) and Payback (PB)...
$arr=array(2,5,4,6,7,8,1); for($i=0;$i<count($arr);$i++) { for($j=$i;$j<count($arr);$j++) { if($arr[$i] > $arr[$j]) { $temp=$arr[$i]; $arr[$i]=$arr[$j]; $arr[$j]=$temp; } } }
No arr refers to address of array &arr refers address of address of array but compiler treats arr and & arr, so even you place arr and & arr no error only warnings will be displayed.
discuss the various methods adopted for a capital budgeting decision.
Yes, 'ARR' and 'ARR' are the same for char20. Whatever it means.
no it increases npv
.
for example:int arr[3];arr[0] = 1; /* ok */arr[1] = 2; /* ok */arr[2] = 0; /* ok */arr[3] = -1; /* wrong */arr[-1] = -3; /* wrong */
ways of getting 14 1,1,6,6 6 arrangements (1,6,1,6; 1,6,6,1; 1,1,6,6; 6,6,1,1; 6,1,6,1; 6,1,1,6) 1,2,5,6 24 arr. 1,3,4,6 24 arr. 1,3,5,5 12 arr. 1,4,4,5 12 arr. 2,2,4,6 12 arr. 2,2,5,5 6 arr. 2,3,3,6 12 arr. 2,3,4,5 24 arr. 2,4,4,4 4 arr. 3,3,3,5 4 arr. 3,3,4,4 6 arr. Total: 146 146*(1/6)4 = 0.1127... so slightly over 1/9