Wiki User
∙ 12y agoScientists saw that the membranes of mitochondria and chloroplasts resembled the cell membranes of free-living prokaryotes. This led to two hypotheses. One proposed that mitochondria evolved from endosymbiotic prokaryotes that were able to use oxygen to generate energy rich ATP. The other proposed that chloroplasts evolved from endosymbiotic prokaryotes that had he ability to photosynthesize. Mitochondria and chloroplasts share many features with free-living bacteria, such as there ribosomes have similar size and structure and they reproduce by binary fission. These similarities provide strong evidence of a common ancestry between bacteria and the organelles of living eukaryotic cells.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoScientists suspect that mitochondria and chloroplasts were originally prokaryotic cells because they have their own DNA, ribosomes, and are capable of replicating independently within the cell. Additionally, these organelles have double membranes, similar to some prokaryotic cells that may have been engulfed by early eukaryotic cells through endosymbiosis.
Wiki User
∙ 15y agoTheir genetic structure more closely resembles that of prokaryotic bacteria than the nuclear material of the cells in which they reside.
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoBoth mitochondria and chloroplast contain their own DNA. They also divide at various times and not always when the rest of the cell divides.
Mitochondria and chloroplasts are thought to have once been a free prokaryotic cell.
No, mitochondria are not green. They are typically colorless or pale in color. The green color associated with some cells or tissues is often due to the presence of chloroplasts, not mitochondria.
Scientists believe that mitochondria and chloroplasts originated from ancient prokaryotic cells through a process called endosymbiosis. This theory proposes that mitochondria were once free-living bacteria that were engulfed by a primitive eukaryotic cell, forming a symbiotic relationship. Similarly, chloroplasts are thought to have originated from ancient photosynthetic bacteria that were also engulfed by a eukaryotic cell.
concept that mitochondria and chloroplasts are the result of years of evolution initiated by the endocytosis of bacteria and blue-green algae which, instead of becoming digested, became symbiotic.
Mitochondria and chloroplasts contain their own DNA, separate from the cell's nuclear DNA. This unique DNA is circular, similar to bacterial DNA, leading scientists to hypothesize that these organelles were once independent bacteria that were engulfed by a precursor to eukaryotic cells in a symbiotic relationship.
Mitochondria and chloroplasts are thought to have once been a free prokaryotic cell.
Scientists placed bacteria in their own kingdom, the Monera, because bacteria lack the nuclei, mitochondria, and chloroplasts found in other forms of life
Scientists placed bacteria in their own kingdom, the Monera, because bacteria lack the nuclei, mitochondria, and chloroplasts found in other forms of life
By various bacteria ingesting but not digesting other bacteria, most likely the precursors of mitochondria (and/or chloroplasts).
No, bacteria do not have plastids. Plastids are organelles found in plant cells and some protists, responsible for functions like photosynthesis and storage of nutrients. Bacteria do not contain plastids in their cellular structure.
Scientists believe that mitochondria and chloroplasts originated from ancient prokaryotic cells through a process called endosymbiosis. This theory proposes that mitochondria were once free-living bacteria that were engulfed by a primitive eukaryotic cell, forming a symbiotic relationship. Similarly, chloroplasts are thought to have originated from ancient photosynthetic bacteria that were also engulfed by a eukaryotic cell.
Scientists placed bacteria in their own kingdom, the Monera, because bacteria lack the nuclei, mitochondria, and chloroplasts found in other forms of life
Scientists believe that mitochondria may have evolved from bacteria because they have their own DNA, replicate independently within cells, and have similar characteristics to certain types of bacteria. Additionally, the endosymbiotic theory suggests that mitochondria were once free-living bacteria that were engulfed by early eukaryotic cells and formed a symbiotic relationship.
The development of the light microscope in the 1800s helped scientists identify cell organelles. This allowed for better visualization of the internal structure of cells and facilitated the discovery and characterization of organelles such as the nucleus, mitochondria, and chloroplasts.
The endosymbiotic theory suggests that eukaryotic cells arose from a mutual relationship of prokaryotic cells. Evidence shows that prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells share many characteristics. The theory focuses on the origins of the chloroplasts and mitochondria of photosynthetic prokaryotes and aerobic heterotrophs, respectively. The similarities in characteristics include: 1. They both go through binary fission to reproduce 2. Eukaryotes are about the same size as eubacteria 3. The ribosomes of the eukaryotes, when examined with great detail, more resemble those of a prokaryote than a eukaryote Scientists believe that archezoa, a eurkaryotic organism, most resembles the prokaryotes. It does not contain mitochondria.
concept that mitochondria and chloroplasts are the result of years of evolution initiated by the endocytosis of bacteria and blue-green algae which, instead of becoming digested, became symbiotic.
Scientists discovered the existence of cells, microorganisms, and structures within cells, such as organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts. Microscopes have also helped researchers study complex biological processes at the cellular and molecular levels.