They didn't understand the Galileo's theory, because they thought the sun & planets revolved around the Earth.
.
Catholic AnswerThe Church had no problem with Galileo's theory, as a matter of fact, it was Copernicus who had previously put forward the theory and the Pope had congratulated him and given him a commendation. The Church had a problem with Galileo because he wanted to teach his theory as fact and not as theory. The Church told him that he had to have proof first, Galileo was a stubborn man who snubbed the Pope who was a personal friend of his! For a more complete answer, detailing the various problems, please see the article below at Catholic Answers.The Catholic Church opposed Galileo's heliocentric theory because it contradicted the geocentric model of the universe supported by the Church at the time. Galileo's views were seen as challenging the Church's teachings and authority, leading to his trial and condemnation by the Inquisition in 1633. The Church's condemnation of Galileo was also influenced by the political and social context of the time.
The Roman Catholic Church opposed many of Galileo's scientific discoveries. A major conflict began between the Roman Catholic Church and Galileo after he discovered that the Earth orbits around the sun. Previously, everyone had thought that Sun orbited the Earth, they believed that the Earth being the center of the Universe was proof of human's closeness to God. Galileo challenged this belief and angered the Roman Catholic Church.
Geocentric theories held by the church kept mankind, the deity's highest creation, at the center of the universe. Heliocentric theories as proposed by Galileo displaced mankind from that position. This thought was abhorrent to the church.
This proposed change would re-order the universe and counter the divine plan as seen by the church.
Catholic AnswerIt's just Catholic, not Roman Catholic. Roman is an epithet first commonly used in England after the protestant revolt to describe the Catholic Church. It is never used by the official Catholic Church.Galileo was teaching the heliocentric theory of Copernicus as fact. Cardinal Bellarmine disagreed with him and said that it disagreed with Scripture. Galileo, though, was a personal friend of the Pope at that time. The Inquisition looked into the case and told him that he could teach, but only as a theory until he had some proof - which he didn't. Galileo agreed, then turned around, and ignored his solemn word to the Inquisition, figuring that he knew better, even though he still had no proof, he continued to teach Copernicus theory as fact. The Inquisition arrested him for violating his sworn word, and held him in a rather comfortable accommodation. Galileo berated everybody, including his friend, the Pope. He did not exactly endear himself to anyone, even though everyone was trying to help him! For more of the story, see the link below at the Catholic Encyclopedia, and the explanation from Catholic Answers at the links below:
It was because they felt there was not enough evidence to change the established view of the realities of the Earth and its place in the universe as laid down in the scriptures.
Galileo was told he could teach the Copernican system as a theory to study and predict the movements of the planets, as long as he did not say it was the absolute truth. He did not obey this instruction, which led to his trial. To understand the difference you have to realise that scientific theories always require time and evidence before they can be properly accepted as the truth.
In the dispute Galileo claimed the Copernican system was right. This put the Sun at the centre, while the Church and the scriptures adhered to the Ptolemaic system with the Earth at the centre.
Eventually a new model published by Kepler in 1609 was shown to be right. It had the Sun at the centre, but the planets' orbits were ellipses, which Galileo never accepted. Neither the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories stood the test of time and it was Kepler's model that prevailed. Newton's discoveries later in the 17th century demonstrated the correctness of the Kepler model, which is still in use today.
The history of the dispute was always oversimplified by Protestant Propaganda in the 17th century that sought to portray the Catholic church merely as opposed to progress, but the facts above show that it was a bit more complicated than that.
The heliocentric theory, which placed the Sun at the center of the universe instead of Earth, contradicted the geocentric view endorsed by the Catholic Church. This challenge to the Church's teachings on cosmology was seen as undermining their authority and control over knowledge, leading to conflicts and condemnations against proponents of the heliocentric theory like Galileo Galilei.
Galileo had a quarrelsome nature and said he was celeverer than all the cardinals. So his disagreement was with the whole Catholic Church. He promoted Copernicus's theory, which the church authorities said was OK as a theory, but he was told not to say it was the absolute truth, because that contradicted the scriptures as they stood then. But later he published a book supporting the heliocentric idea, in which the Pope was portrayed as a simpleton. He was asked for proof of the theory, but could not produce one in court and recanted his views. But many years later Kepler's theory of the planets' orbits was backed up by Newton's theoretical discoveries. The new theory, which is still in use today, retained Copernicus's idea of having the Sun at the centre, so the heliocentric idea promoted by Copernicus and Galileo was eventually demonstrated to be correct, many years after their lifetimes.
the Earth goes around the Sun....just like everyone else thinks.
Galileo publicly denied his findings to avoid persecution by the Catholic Church, which had condemned heliocentrism as heretical. He faced the threat of harsh punishment, including imprisonment and possibly death if he did not recant his findings.
Galileo's brilliant discoveries (like the discoveries of Jupiter's moons etc.) did not cause an uproar but his unsupported claim that the Sun is at the centre of the Solar System was against Catholic teaching at the time, and he promoted it by ridiculing the Pope and was put on trial, when it became clear there was no proof at that time. When proof was eventually produced, long after Galileo's death, the church accepted the theory.
Yes. The geocentric theory was established by renowned ancient thinkers like Aristotle and Ptolemy. It was also the belief of the then-dominant Roman Catholic Church. Few people were willing to challenge the teachings of Ptolemy, Aristotle and the Roman Catholic church. When Galileo Galilei proposed the heliocentric theory, he was prosecuted by the Catholic church. He was forced to take his theories back or risk ruining his family's reputation as well as death.
why did the pope in the 17th century and the catholic church not like withches
The heliocentric theory, which placed the Sun at the center of the universe instead of Earth, contradicted the geocentric view endorsed by the Catholic Church. This challenge to the Church's teachings on cosmology was seen as undermining their authority and control over knowledge, leading to conflicts and condemnations against proponents of the heliocentric theory like Galileo Galilei.
Worshiping the holy Lord in one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.Roman Catholic AnswerWhat I like most about belonging to the Catholic Church is that I am following my Lord, and Savior, Jesus Christ in the only Church that He founded, outside of which there is no salvation.
Um... the Catholic Church is a Christian church. Like Lutheran or Anglican, it's a denomination of Christianity.
Roman Catholic AnswerThe Catholic Church does NOT "fear" opening its archives, and it is NOT a normal library.
Catholics are any who profess to believe in the teachings of the Catholic Church. Teachings of the Catholic Church are outlined in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, which is kind of like the Catholic Church's Constitution.
Yes, in that they both originated with the Catholic Church, went into schism, while retaining valid Orders and valid sacraments: to that extent they are alike, although the American Catholic Church, which is derived from the Old Catholic Church, a schismatic group that went into schism after the First Vatican Council, is not in communion with the Catholic Church nor the Orthodox Church. The American Catholic Church is in communion with the Anglican Church meaning, when all is said and done, they are yet another protestant church, while the Russian Orthodox remains Catholic to a degree.
Roman Catholic AnswerAn Episcopalian, regardless of his persuasion (high church or low church) is still a protestant, even if he likes the more Catholic ceremonies of the high church. Holy Communion in a Catholic Church is restricted to those who believe as a Catholic and are in a state of grace (have been baptised, and have been to confession). An Episcopalian is not Catholic, and does not believe as the Catholic Church does. If he does believe what the Catholic Church does, like everyone else, he must attend RCIA classes and be legitimately brought into the Church at the Easter Vigil. Having been a "high church" Episcopalian myself, I know of what I speak!
Yes, he is Catholic and attends church.
Roman Catholic AnswerI think you have this backwards, the Church, in Christ, is like a sacrament - The Church IS a sign and an instrument of communion with God and of unity among men - from the Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraph 775.
I would like the schedule of masses at Parroquia Santa Rosa de Lima catholic church in Rincon Puerto Rico?