0
the consequential inevitability of two such impossible occurrences could potentially cause a singularity in the instance and or under the assumption that the U.F. will not stop and the I.O. cannot give, the resulting impact could destroy the fabric of space time in the relevance of antimatter vs matter in our dimension opening two simultaneous alternate dimensions. although in theory, two such super powered occurrences cannot exist and alone could destroy our universe let alone together in the same space.
This scenario is a paradox, as both objects cannot exist simultaneously according to their definitions. An "immovable object" cannot be moved under any circumstances, while an "unstoppable object" cannot be stopped. Therefore, the question itself is illogical and has no real-world answer.
Then you have two options: If the "unstoppable" objects stops, then it wasn't really unstoppable; and if the "immovable" object starts moving, then it wasn't really immovable.
In the real world, there are no immovable or unstoppable objects. Any time two objects collide, the speed of both will change.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What happens when an unstopabul force meat an emovebal object?
This scenario sets up a paradox because an unstoppable force cannot be slowed or stopped by any means, while an immovable object cannot be moved or affected by any force. If they were to meet, it would result in a logical contradiction. It is considered a thought experiment with no real-world solution.
What net force is acting on an immobile object?
If an object is immobile, it means that the net force acting on it is zero. This is in accordance with Newton's First Law of Motion which states that an object at rest will remain at rest unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.
Solid body that does not collide with a planet?
An object in space that does not interact with a planet's gravitational field would follow a straight-line path through space, unaffected by the planet's presence. This could happen if the object has sufficient velocity to escape the planet's gravitational pull or if the planet is too far away for its gravity to have a significant effect on the object's trajectory.
An object is traveling in a straight line in space no forces are acting on the object based on this evidence what will happen to the objects motion?
Nothing will happen to the object's motion, it will continue along its path.
What will happen to an object at rest if it is pushed but there is a large frictional force acting on the object?
It will stay at rest.
What would happen if an immovable object got hit by an unstoppable force?
If the unstoppable object was smaller, then it would pierce a hole through the immovable object, not moving the object, and not stopping.
What were to happen if an immovable object was collided by an unstoppable force?
This scenario poses a paradox because it assumes the existence of two contradictory concepts - an immovable object and an unstoppable force. In reality, both cannot coexist, so the outcome is undefined or illogical. Physics does not provide a definitive answer to this hypothetical situation.
What are the release dates for Broken Toy - 2009 Unstoppable Force Immovable Object 2-8?
Broken Toy - 2009 Unstoppable Force Immovable Object 2-8 was released on: USA: 6 February 2013
Is there a question that cannot be answered that doesnt have to do with science?
Basic paradoxes are examples of questions that cannot be answered. For example, what happens when an immovable object meets an unstoppable force? Since neither an immovable object nor an unstoppable force exist in reality, there is no way to determine what would happen in this theoretical situation. Source: personal experience
What happens when an irresistable force meets an immovable object?
This classic paradox poses a hypothetical scenario where contradictory conditions exist. If an irresistible force exists, it should be able to overcome any resistance, but if an immovable object exists, it cannot be moved by any force. In reality, it is impossible for both concepts to coexist, as their definitions would cancel each other out.
What happens when an object that cannot be stopped collides with and object that cannot be moved?
If an object that cannot be stopped collides with an object that cannot be moved, it would result in a transfer of momentum and energy between the objects. This collision may cause deformation or damage to one or both objects, depending on their respective properties. The outcome would follow the laws of physics governing momentum and energy conservation.
What happens when an immovable object is struck by an unstoppable force?
Since these are extremes that cannot be acheived due to the laws of physics, it cannot happen. However, If it could happen, I suspect a paradox would occur.
What happens when a unstoppable force meats an immovable object?
Since these are extremes that cannot be acheived due to the laws of physics, it cannot happen. However, If it could happen, I suspect a paradox would occur.
What happens when an unstopable force meets an immobile object?
It's a paradox known as the "unstoppable force paradox" and it challenges the idea that both an unstoppable force and an immovable object can exist simultaneously. It's a thought experiment that raises questions about the fundamental laws of physics and what would happen in such a scenario.
What is the connection between gunpowder and fireworks?
there is no difference lol thats just like asking what happens when an unstoppable force hits an immovable object - IT TURNS AROUND just because its unstoppable doesnt mean its immovable THE MORE YOU KNOW /god
What happens when an unstopable object meets an unmovable object and they collide together?
This scenario presents a paradox, as an unstoppable object would not be able to be stopped by any force, while an immovable object cannot be moved by any force. In reality, such objects cannot coexist within the same universe.
What would happen if an unstoppable object collided with an immobile object?
the particles would split tocreate multiple unstoppable objects
