The statement is not accurate. Neutrons do not have an electrical charge, but they do have mass.
An atom of oxygen typically has 8 protons, 8 neutrons, and 8 electrons, giving it a mass number of 16. Oxygen-18, on the other hand, has 8 protons and 10 neutrons, totaling a mass number of 18.
True. The majority of the Earth's oxygen (about 21%) is found in the atmosphere as molecular oxygen (O2). This oxygen is produced mainly by photosynthetic organisms such as plants and phytoplankton.
Several come to mind. They are both found in the nucleus of an atom. Protons have a positive charge, while neutrons have no charge. They are nearly the same size, though neutrons are a bit larger. The sum of the protons and neutrons in an isotope of an element is its mass number.
they spend most of there time associated with the oxygen atoms
The statement is not accurate. Neutrons do not have an electrical charge, but they do have mass.
They can be found in the nucleus.
they are both made of protons, neutrons, and electrons
"All subatomic particles have the same mass" is not a true statement, as different subatomic particles, such as protons, neutrons, and electrons, have different masses and charges.
bayag
An atom of oxygen typically has 8 protons, 8 neutrons, and 8 electrons, giving it a mass number of 16. Oxygen-18, on the other hand, has 8 protons and 10 neutrons, totaling a mass number of 18.
Carbide-12 and oxygen-18 are isotopes of carbon and oxygen, respectively. They have different numbers of neutrons in their atomic nuclei compared to the more common isotopes, carbon-13 and oxygen-16. These isotopes are used in various scientific studies, such as radiocarbon dating for carbon-14 and paleoclimatology studies for oxygen-18.
True. The majority of the Earth's oxygen (about 21%) is found in the atmosphere as molecular oxygen (O2). This oxygen is produced mainly by photosynthetic organisms such as plants and phytoplankton.
If the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then "This statement is false" is true, making the statement false. But if the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then... It's one of the biggest paradoxes ever, just like saying, "I'm lying right now."
Circular logic would be a statement or series of statements that are true because of another statement, which is true because of the first. For example, statement A is true because statement B is true. Statement B is true because statement A is true
No. I'm not sure it's even false. It's more a case of "this statement makes no sense whatsoever."
Subatomic particles are the same size as basketballs.