False. A white dwarf star is much smaller in size compared to the sun. A white dwarf is typically about the size of the Earth, whereas the sun is much larger, around 100 times wider and more massive than a white dwarf star.
even though a white dwarf may burn hot, it's size is what limits it's luminosity. Here is one way to look at it: Imagine a white dwarf with the mass of our sun. Our sun's surface temp is right around 5,770K and weighs one solar mass. Now, this imaginary white dwarf would be about the size of the earth and have a surface temp of around 10,000K - 11,000K. This white dwarf would have a surface area 1/333,000 of the sun. A white dwarf of this size is about average and as you can imagine, has very little room to put out energy compared to other solar masses.
The same size as the white dwarf it was. See related question.
No, dwarf stars are smaller in size and mass compared to our Sun. They are classified by their lower luminosity and surface temperature.
The 1.2 solar mass white dwarf would have the smallest radius. White dwarfs are very dense objects with masses comparable to the Sun, but in a much smaller volume due to gravitational collapse. Jupiter, being a gas giant, is much larger in size compared to a white dwarf of the same mass.
A white dwarf is typically about the size of Earth, which is much smaller than its main sequence size when it was a larger star. During the white dwarf phase, the star has lost its outer layers and collapsed to a much smaller size due to gravity.
False. A white dwarf star is much smaller in size compared to the sun. A white dwarf is typically about the size of the Earth, whereas the sun is much larger, around 100 times wider and more massive than a white dwarf star.
No, a typical white dwarf star is roughly the size of the Earth.
The maximum size of a white dwarf is about 1.4 times the mass of the Sun, known as the Chandrasekhar limit. If a white dwarf exceeds this limit, it can collapse further and ignite as a supernova.
even though a white dwarf may burn hot, it's size is what limits it's luminosity. Here is one way to look at it: Imagine a white dwarf with the mass of our sun. Our sun's surface temp is right around 5,770K and weighs one solar mass. Now, this imaginary white dwarf would be about the size of the earth and have a surface temp of around 10,000K - 11,000K. This white dwarf would have a surface area 1/333,000 of the sun. A white dwarf of this size is about average and as you can imagine, has very little room to put out energy compared to other solar masses.
A supergiant is much larger than a white dwarf. A supergiant can be 10 to 70 times the size of our Sun, whereas a white dwarf is only about the size of the Earth.
The term "white dwarf" was coined by astronomer Willem Luyten in the 1920s to describe the fainter, cooler remnants of Sun-like stars. The word "white" refers to its color, which appears white due to its low surface temperature, while "dwarf" denotes its small size compared to other types of stars.
The same size as the white dwarf it was. See related question.
A white dwarf, also called a degenerate dwarf, is a small star composed mostly of electron-degenerate matter. They are very dense; a white dwarf's mass is comparable to that of the Sun and its volume is comparable to that of the Earth.
No. In about 7.5 billion years the Sun will become a white dwarf.
Yes, far smaller. A red dwarf is a whole star in and of itself. A white dwarf is the collapsed remnant of the core of a low-to medium mass star. A white dwarf may be about the size of Earth.
A white dwarf is very small as stars go; comparable in size to a small planet such as Earth.